Cited by 259Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Amyloid β-Protein Dimers Rapidly Form Stable Synaptotoxic Protofibrils

Open access
O'Nuallain, Brian, Freir, Darragh B., Nicoll, Andrew J., Risse, Emmanuel, Ferguson, Neil, Herron, Caroline E., Collinge, John, Walsh, Dominic M.·2010·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Nonfibrillar, water-soluble low-molecular weight assemblies of the amyloid β-protein (Aβ) are believed to play an important role in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Aqueous extracts of human brain contain Aβ assemblies that migrate on SDS-polyacrylamide gels and elute from size exclusion as dimers (∼8 kDa) and can block long-term potentiation and impair memory consolidation in the rat. Such species are detected specifically and sensitively in extracts of Alzheimer brain suggesting that SDS-stable dimers may be the basic building blocks of AD-associated synaptotoxic assemblies. Consequently, understanding the structure and properties of Aβ dimers is of great interest. In the absence of sufficient brain-derived dimer to facilitate biophysical analysis, we generated synthetic dimers designed to mimic the natural species. For this, Aβ(1-40) containing cysteine in place of serine 26 was used to produce disulphide cross-linked dimer, (AβS26C)2. Such dimers had no detectable secondary structure, produced an analytical ultracentrifugation profile consistent for an ∼8.6 kDa protein, and had no effect on hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP). However, (AβS26C)2 aggregated more rapidly than either AβS26C or wild-type monomers and formed parastable β-sheet rich, thioflavin T-positive, protofibril-like assemblies. Whereas wild-type Aβ aggregated to form typical amyloid fibrils, the protofibril-like structures formed by (AβS26C)2 persisted for prolonged periods and potently inhibited LTP in mouse hippocampus. These data support the idea that Aβ dimers may stabilize the formation of fibril intermediates by a process distinct from that available to Aβ monomer and that higher molecular weight prefibrillar assemblies are the proximate mediators of Aβ toxicity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.3537-10.2010

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Soluble Aβ aggregates are more toxic than monomers or insoluble fibrils.

    “Among these various forms, soluble Aβ aggregates are more toxic than monomers or insoluble fibrils; thus, reducing these soluble Aβ aggregates could represent a practical treatment approach in the early stages of AD [10,11,12].”

    From Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease: Beyond Symptomatic Therapies (2023) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Discussion describes non-fibrillar, water-soluble Aβ as the principal mediators of neurotoxicity, and the Results show that soluble protofibrils inhibit synaptic plasticity. The paper does not directly compare their toxicity with that of monomers or insoluble mature fibrils, so the full comparative claim is not established. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Reducing soluble Aβ aggregates could represent a practical treatment approach in the early stages of AD.

    “Among these various forms, soluble Aβ aggregates are more toxic than monomers or insoluble fibrils; thus, reducing these soluble Aβ aggregates could represent a practical treatment approach in the early stages of AD [10,11,12].”

    From Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease: Beyond Symptomatic Therapies (2023) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says therapeutic targeting of Aβ dimers remains attractive because it should prevent formation of toxic pre-fibrillar assemblies. This supports a possible treatment strategy, but the paper does not specify treatment in the early stages of AD or establish that broadly reducing soluble aggregates is practical. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Laue T Shah B Ridgeway T Pelletier S Harding S Horton J Rowe A Computer-aided interpretation of analytical sedimentation data for proteins Analytical Ultracentrifugation in Biochemistry and Polymer Science 1992 Cambridge Royal Society of Chemistry 90 125

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O'Nuallain, B., Freir, D. B., Nicoll, A. J., Risse, E., Ferguson, N., Herron, C. E., Collinge, J., & Walsh, D. M.
Affiliations
  • University College Dublin (IE)
  • MRC Prion Unit (GB)
Corresponding author
Walsh, Dominic M.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2010-10-27
Volume
30
Issue
43
Pages
14411-14419
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2040863516
Cited by
259
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 29
FWCI
16.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Repository UCD (University College Dublin) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Health Research Board
  • Science Foundation Ireland (0.8/1N.1/B2033)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. Public Health Service (IRO1AGO27443)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG027443)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
amyloid-beta, protofibrils, Alzheimer's disease, synaptotoxicity, long-term potentiation, Aβ(1-40), protein aggregation, beta-sheet, hippocampus
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Circular Dichroism, Cross-Linking Reagents, Drug Synergism, Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel, Electrophysiology, Light, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Microscopy, Electron, Molecular Sequence Data, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurotoxins, Protein Conformation, Scattering, Radiation, Synapses, Ultracentrifugation, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Neurofibrillary Tangles, Dimerization, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review