Cited by 243Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Molecular and Functional Properties of Regional Astrocytes in the Adult Brain

Open access
Morel, Lydie, Chiang, Ming Sum R., Higashimori, Haruki, Shoneye, Temitope, Iyer, Lakshmanan K., Yelick, Julia, Tai, Albert, Yang, Yongjie·2017·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The molecular signature and functional properties of astroglial subtypes in the adult CNS remain largely undefined. By using translational ribosome affinity purification followed by RNA-Seq, we profiled astroglial ribosome-associated (presumably translating) mRNAs in major cortical and subcortical brain regions (cortex, hippocampus, caudate-putamen, nucleus accumbens, thalamus, and hypothalamus) of BAC aldh1l1-translational ribosome affinity purification (TRAP) mice (both sexes). We found that the expression of astroglial translating mRNAs closely follows the dorsoventral axis, especially from cortex/hippocampus to thalamus/hypothalamus posteriorly. This region-specific expression pattern of genes, such as synaptogenic modulator sparc and transcriptional factors (emx2, lhx2, and hopx), was validated by qRT-PCR and immunostaining in brain sections. Interestingly, cortical or subcortical astrocytes selectively promote neurite growth and synaptic activity of neurons only from the same region in mismatched cocultures, exhibiting region-matched astrocyte to neuron communication. Overall, these results generated new molecular signature of astrocyte types in the adult CNS, providing insights into their origin and functional diversity. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT We investigated the in vivo molecular and functional heterogeneity of astrocytes inter-regionally from adult brain. Our results showed that the expression pattern of ribosome-associated mRNA profiles in astrocytes closely follows the dorsoventral axis, especially posteriorly from cortex/hippocampus to thalamus/hypothalamus. In line with this, our functional results further demonstrated region-selective roles of cortical and subcortical astrocytes in regulating cortical or subcortical neuronal synaptogenesis and maturation. These in vivo studies provide a previously uncharacterized and important molecular atlas for exploring region-specific astroglial functions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.3956-16.2017

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Less is known about the transcriptomic heterogeneity of astrocytes across different cortical areas in the aging human brain.

    “but less is known about the transcriptomic heterogeneity of astrocytes across different cortical areas in the aging human brain.”

    From Astrocyte transcriptomic changes along the spatiotemporal progression of Alzheimer’s disease (2024) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Introduction (page not provided) says earlier in vivo astrocyte gene profiling largely focused on the cortex or developing ages, and that regional human-brain datasets were not astrocyte-specific. This supports a general knowledge gap, but the paper studies adult mice and does not establish the claim specifically for different cortical areas in the aging human brain. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Astrocytes are organized into distinct functional-associated layers throughout the grey matter.

    “Considering that astrocytes are organized into distinct functional‐associated layers throughout the GM [98, 99, 100, 101]”

    From Gliovascular alterations in sporadic and familial Alzheimer's disease: <scp><i>APOE3</i></scp> Christchurch homozygote glioprotection (2023) · cites this paper as [99]

    The Introduction describes spatial domains and region-dependent functional differences among astrocytes. But the Discussion says how astrocytes regulate local circuitry in different cortical layers remains essentially unknown; the paper does not establish distinct functional layers throughout grey matter. The indexed passages provide section labels but no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Ribo-tag restricts analysis to ribosome-associated mRNAs, which are more likely to be actively being made into proteins, providing a representation of the translational state of the cells.

    “Ribo-tag restricts analysis to ribosome-associated mRNAs, which are more likely to be actively being made into proteins, providing a representation of the translational state of the cells, a similar approach to that used by others (Chai et al., 2017; Doyle et al., 2008; Morel et al., 2017).”

    From The aging astrocyte transcriptome from multiple regions of the mouse brain. (2018) · cites this paper as Morel et al., 2017

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kettenmann H (2015) Neuroglia, Ed 2. New York: Oxford UP.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morel, L., Chiang, M. S. R., Higashimori, H., Shoneye, T., Iyer, L. K., Yelick, J., Tai, A., & Yang, Y.
Affiliations
Tufts University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2017-08-07
Volume
37
Issue
36
Pages
8706-8717
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2744386347
Cited by
243
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 2
FWCI
12.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Center for Neuroscience Research
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH099554, R01MH106490)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R25GM066567)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R03NS079805, R21NS087391, P30NS047243)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
astrocytes, regional heterogeneity, dorsal-ventral axis, ribosome-associated mRNA, astrocyte-neuron communication, synaptogenesis, neuronal maturation, SPARC, Emx2, Lhx2, HOPX, hippocampus, thalamus, hypothalamus, caudate-putamen, nucleus accumbens, adult brain
MeSH terms
Animals, Astrocytes, Brain, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Transcription Factors, Gene Expression Profiling, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review