Cited by 391Visual perception and processing mechanismsNeural dynamics and brain functionVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

Neural dissociation between visual awareness and spatial attention

Open access
Wyart, Valentin, Tallon-Baudry, Catherine·2008·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

To what extent does what we consciously see depend on where we attend to? Psychologists have long stressed the tight relationship between visual awareness and spatial attention at the behavioral level. However, the amount of overlap between their neural correlates remains a matter of debate. We recorded magnetoencephalographic signals while human subjects attended toward or away from faint stimuli that were reported as consciously seen only half of the time. Visually identical stimuli could thus be attended or not and consciously seen or not. Although attended stimuli were consciously seen slightly more often than unattended ones, the factorial analysis of stimulus-induced oscillatory brain activity revealed distinct and independent neural correlates of visual awareness and spatial attention at different frequencies in the gamma range (30-150 Hz). Whether attended or not, consciously seen stimuli induced increased mid-frequency gamma-band activity over the contralateral visual cortex, whereas spatial attention modulated high-frequency gamma-band activity in response to both consciously seen and unseen stimuli. A parametric analysis of the data at the single-trial level confirmed that the awareness-related mid-frequency activity drove the seen-unseen decision but also revealed a small influence of the attention-related high-frequency activity on the decision. These results suggest that subjective visual experience is shaped by the cumulative contribution of two processes operating independently at the neural level, one reflecting visual awareness per se and the other reflecting spatial attention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.4748-07.2008

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In studies instructing subjects to attend to a location and presenting consciously perceived or subliminal stimuli, neuronal correlates of attention and conscious perception differed when assessed with fMRI or MEG.

    “In these studies, the neuronal correlates of attention and conscious perception differed if assessed with fMRI (Watanabe et al., 2011) or MEG (Wyart et al., 2012; Wyart and Tallon-Baudry, 2008).”

    From Conscious Processing and the Global Neuronal Workspace Hypothesis (2020) · cites this paper as Wyart and Tallon-Baudry, 2008

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Buzsaki G (2006) Rhythms of the brain. Oxford, UK: Oxford UP.
  2. Green DM, Swets JA (1966) Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
  3. Metzinger T, ed (2000) Neural correlates of consciousness: empirical and conceptual questions. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
  4. Searle JR (1992) The rediscovery of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wyart, V., & Tallon-Baudry, C.
Affiliations
Université Pierre-et-Marie-Curie (FR)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2008-03-05
Volume
28
Issue
10
Pages
2667-2679
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1974356429
Cited by
391
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 29
FWCI
16.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
visual awareness, spatial attention, neural correlates of consciousness, gamma oscillations, magnetoencephalography
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Awareness, Female, Humans, Male, Photic Stimulation, Space Perception, Vision, Ocular, Visual Pathways, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review