The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cracking the Language Code: Neural Mechanisms Underlying Speech Parsing
Open accessAbstract
Word segmentation, detecting word boundaries in continuous speech, is a critical aspect of language learning. Previous research in infants and adults demonstrated that a stream of speech can be readily segmented based solely on the statistical and speech cues afforded by the input. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), the neural substrate of word segmentation was examined on-line as participants listened to three streams of concatenated syllables, containing either statistical regularities alone, statistical regularities and speech cues, or no cues. Despite the participants’ inability to explicitly detect differences between the speech streams, neural activity differed significantly across conditions, with left-lateralized signal increases in temporal cortices observed only when participants listened to streams containing statistical regularities, particularly the stream containing speech cues. In a second fMRI study, designed to verify that word segmentation had implicitly taken place, participants listened to trisyllabic combinations that occurred with different frequencies in the streams of speech they just heard (“words,” 45 times; “partwords,” 15 times; “nonwords,” once). Reliably greater activity in left inferior and middle frontal gyri was observed when comparing words with partwords and, to a lesser extent, when comparing partwords with nonwords. Activity in these regions, taken to index the implicit detection of word boundaries, was positively correlated with participants’ rapid auditory processing skills. These findings provide a neural signature of on-line word segmentation in the mature brain and an initial model with which to study developmental changes in the neural architecture involved in processing speech cues during language learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Early language acquisition: cracking the speech code
Kuhl, P. K. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1533 · Cited by 2,291
Word Segmentation: The Role of Distributional Cues
Saffran, J. R., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (1996) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.0032 · Cited by 1,405 · cited 5×
“…specify word boundaries, research has shown that infants as young as 7.5 months of age can use statistical regularities such as the greater co-occurrence of syllables within words than between words to successfully parse a continuous stream of speech (Saffran et al., 1996a; Aslin et al., 1998).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialNeural Correlates of Motor Memory Consolidation
Shadmehr, R., & Holcomb, H. H. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5327.821 · Cited by 1,022
Listening to speech activates motor areas involved in speech production
Wilson, S. M., Saygin, A. P., Sereno, M. I., & Iacoboni, M. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1263 · Cited by 885
The Neural Correlates of Motor Skill Automaticity
Poldrack, R. A., Sabb, F. W., Foerde, K., Tom, S. M., Asarnow, R. F., Bookheimer, S. Y., & Knowlton, B. J. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3880-04.2005 · Cited by 600 · cited 2×
“…and prosodic cues available in the artificial languages only) was expected to yield overall less activity for the artificial language streams within language-relevant frontotemporal regions and the basal ganglia, which are known to be involved in sequence learning (Poldrack et al., 2005).”
BackgroundResultImproving language and literacy is a matter of time
Tallal, P. (2004) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1499 · Cited by 488
Neural correlates of second-language word learning: minimal instruction produces rapid change.
McLaughlin, J., Osterhout, L., & Kim, A. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1264 · Cited by 450
The role of segmentation in phonological processing: an fMRI investigation
Burton, M. W., Small, S. L., & Blumstein, S. E. (2000) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892900562309 · Cited by 378
Brain mechanisms in normal and dyslexic readers
Temple, E. (2002) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(02)00303-3 · Cited by 173
Cited by
Turk-Browne, N. B., Scholl, B. J., Chun, M. M., & Johnson, M. K. (2009) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21131 · Cited by 523
The functional neuroanatomy of language
Hickok, G. (2009) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2009.06.001 · Cited by 444
Statistical Learning: From Acquiring Specific Items to Forming General Rules
Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (2012) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721412436806 · Cited by 348
Scott-Van Zeeland, A. A., Abrahams, B. S., Alvarez-Retuerto, A. I., Sonnenblick, L. I., Rudie, J. D., Ghahremani, D., Mumford, J. A., Poldrack, R. A., Dapretto, M., Geschwind, D. H., et al. (2010) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3001344 · Cited by 252
Self-citationHasson, U., Egidi, G., Marelli, M., & Willems, R. M. (2018) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.018 · Cited by 157
Metadata
- Authors
- McNealy, K., Mazziotta, J. C., & Dapretto, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2006-07-19
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 29
- Pages
- 7629-7639
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2013822626
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 2.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cracking the Language Code: Neural Mechanisms Underlying Speech Parsing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.5501-05.2006
- The paper
- McNealy, K., Mazziotta, J. C., & Dapretto, M. (2006). Cracking the Language Code: Neural Mechanisms Underlying Speech Parsing. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.5501-05.2006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.