Cited by 320

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dimeric Amyloid β Protein Rapidly Accumulates in Lipid Rafts followed by Apolipoprotein E and Phosphorylated Tau Accumulation in the Tg2576 Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease

Kawarabayashi, Takeshi, Shoji, Mikio, Younkin, Linda H., Wen-Lang, Lin, Dickson, Dennis W., Murakami, Tetsuro, Matsubara, Etsuro, Abe, Koji, Ashe, Karen Hsiao, Younkin, Steven G.·2004·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

To investigate lipid rafts as a site where amyloid β protein (Aβ) oligomers might accumulate and cause toxicity in Alzheimer's disease (AD), we analyzed Aβ in the Tg2576 transgenic mouse model of AD. Aβ was highly concentrated in lipid rafts, which comprise a small fraction of brain volume but contain 27% of brain Aβ42 and 24% of Aβ40 in young mice. In the Tg2576 model, memory impairment begins at 6 months before amyloid plaques are visible. Here we show that Aβ dimers appear in lipid rafts at 6 months and that raft Aβ, which is primarily dimeric, rapidly accumulates reaching levels >500× those in young mice by 24–28 months. A similar large accumulation of dimeric Aβ was observed in lipid rafts from AD brain. In contrast to extracellular amyloid fibrils, which are SDS-insoluble, virtually all Aβ in lipid rafts is SDS soluble. Coupled with recent studies showing that synthetic and naturally occurring Aβ oligomers can inhibit hippocampal long-term potentiation, the in vivo age-dependent accumulation of SDS-soluble Aβ dimers in lipid rafts at the time when memory impairment begins in Tg2576 mice provides strong evidence linking Aβ oligomers to memory impairment. After dimeric Aβ began to accumulate in lipid rafts of the Tg2576 brain, apolipoprotein E (ApoE) and then phosphorylated tau accumulated. A similar increase in ApoE and a large increase in phosphorylated tau was observed in lipid rafts from AD brain. These findings suggest that lipid rafts may be an important site for interaction between dimeric Aβ, ApoE, and tau.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.5543-03.2004

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 11 references

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 1997, J Neurochem, 69, 1746, 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1997.69041746.x · DOI
  2. 10.1074/jbc.272.21.13793 · DOI
  3. 10.1083/jcb.131.5.1327 · DOI
  4. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.14.1.111 · DOI
  5. 1995, Biochem J, 306, 599, 10.1042/bj3060599 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1074/jbc.272.37.22987 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/0197-4580(95)00013-5 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1083/jcb.200207113 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1073/pnas.92.3.763 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1126/science.1062097 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1073/pnas.87.15.5827 · DOI
  12. 10.1006/bbrc.1995.1912 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/1531-8249(200006)47:6<739::AID-ANA6>3.0.CO;2-8 · DOI
  14. 10.1073/pnas.050004797 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1080/096876899294607 · DOI
  16. 10.1126/science.274.5284.99 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1038/72237 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/0006-8993(91)91558-I · DOI
  19. 1997, J Neurochem, 69, 2026, 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1997.69052026.x · DOI
  20. 2002, J Neurosci, 22, 698, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-03-00698.2002 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1038/nm0698-730 · DOI
  22. 10.1126/science.1058189 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65184-X · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1002/1531-8249(199912)46:6<860::AID-ANA8>3.0.CO;2-M · DOI
  25. 10.1021/bi981843u · DOI
  26. 2000, J Neurosci, 20, 4050, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-11-04050.2000 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 2001, Am J Pathol, 158, 2209, 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64693-7 · DOI
  28. 10.1177/42.2.8288861 · DOI
  29. 10.1074/jbc.M005968200 · DOI
  30. 10.1074/jbc.270.16.9564 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00394-3 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1083/jcb.122.4.789 · DOI
  33. 2001, Physiol Rev, 81, 741, 10.1152/physrev.2001.81.2.741 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1172/JCI200216783 · DOI
  35. 1991, Biochim Biophys Acta, 1090, 91, 10.1016/0167-4781(91)90041-J · DOI
  36. 10.1002/ana.410420612 · DOI
  37. 10.1038/35036052 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1126/science.8191290 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1006/nbdi.2001.0470 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1021/bi001048s · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1042/BST0300552 · DOI
  42. 2002, J Neurosci, 22, 1858, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-05-01858.2002 · DOI
  43. 10.1074/jbc.272.12.7977 · DOI
  44. 2000, J Neuropathol Exp Neurol, 59, 723, 10.1093/jnen/59.8.723 · DOI
  45. 10.1038/nm1095-1062 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 320

Metadata

Authors
Kawarabayashi, T., Shoji, M., Younkin, L. H., Wen-Lang, L., Dickson, D. W., Murakami, T., Matsubara, E., Abe, K., Ashe, K. H., & Younkin, S. G.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2004-04-14
Volume
24
Issue
15
Pages
3801-3809
ISSN
  • 0270-6474
  • 1529-2401
Cited by
320
References
11
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review