Cited by 333Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPrion Diseases and Protein Misfolding

Apolipoprotein E is a kinetic but not a thermodynamic inhibitor of amyloid formation: implications for the pathogenesis and treatment of Alzheimer disease

Open access
Evans, K C, Berger, E P, Cho, C G, Weisgraber, K H, Lansbury, P T·1995·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The apolipoprotein E4 (APOE4) allele is associated with an early age of onset of the nonfamilial form of Alzheimer disease (AD) and with increased beta protein amyloid deposition in the brain. These two observations may both arise from an effect of the apoE family of proteins on the rate of in vivo amyloidogenesis. We report here that apoE3, the common apoE isoform, is an in vitro amyloid nucleation inhibitor at physiological concentrations. A significant delay in the onset of amyloid fibril formation by the beta-amyloid protein of AD (beta 1-40) was observed at a low apoE3 concentration (40 nM), corresponding to an apoE3/beta protein molar ratio of 1:1000. The inhibitory activity of a proteolytic fragment of apoE3, containing the N-terminal 191 amino acids, is comparable to the native protein, whereas the C-terminal fragment has no activity. ApoE4 is equipotent or slightly less potent than apoE3, which may be due to its inability to form a disulfide dimer, since the apoE3 dimer is a significantly more potent nucleation inhibitor than apoE4. Neither apoE3 nor apoE4 inhibits the seeded growth of amyloid or affects the solubility or structure of the amyloid fibrils, indicating that apoE is not a thermodynamic amyloid inhibitor. We propose that the linkage between the APOE4 allele and AD reflects the reduced ability of APOE4 homozygotes to suppress in vivo amyloid formation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.92.3.763

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other studies reported that human apoE isoforms decreased Aβ fibrillogenesis in vitro by interfering with Aβ nucleation.

    “Indeed, other studies reported that human apoE isoforms decreased Aβ fibrillogenesis in vitro by interfering with Aβ nucleation (Beffert and Poirier, 1998; Evans et al., 1995; Webster and Rogers, 1996; Wood et al., 1996).”

    From The role of apolipoprotein E in Alzheimer's disease (2009) · cites this paper as Evans et al., 1995

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [5]Corder, E. H., Saunders, A. M., Strittmatter, W. J., Schmechel, D. E., Gaskell, P. C., Small, G. W., Roses, A. D., Haines, J. L. & Pericak-Vance, M. A. (1993) Science 261, 921–923.
  2. [7]Štrittmatter, W. J., Weisgraber, K. H., Huang, D. Y., Dong, L.-M., Salvesen, G. S., Pericak-Vance, M., Schmechel, D., Saunders, A. M., Goldgaber, D. & Roses, A. D. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 8098–8102.
  3. [13]Schmechel, D. E., Saunders, A. M., Strittmatter, W. J., Crain, B. J., Hulette, C. M., Joo, S. H., Pericak-Vance, M. A., Goldgaber, D. & Roses, A. D. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 9649–9653.
  4. [17]Strittmatter, W. J., Saunders, A. M., Schmechel, D., PericakVance, M., Enghild, J., Salvesen, G. S. & Roses, A. D. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 1977–1981.
  5. [20]Horowitz, J. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 10449–10453.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Evans, K. C., Berger, E. P., Cho, C. G., Weisgraber, K. H., & Lansbury, P. T.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
1995-01-31
Volume
92
Issue
3
Pages
763-767
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2037800112
Cited by
333
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 13
FWCI
17.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Ariad Pharmaceuticals
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Genentech
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG008470, AG 08470)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding
Keywords
apolipoprotein E, APOE ε4, APOE3, Aβ40, amyloid fibril formation, Alzheimer's disease, disulfide dimer, proteolytic fragments, amyloid seeding
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Apolipoproteins E, Humans, Kinetics, Peptide Fragments, Protein Conformation, Thermodynamics, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Apolipoprotein E3, Apolipoprotein E4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review