Cited by 972Linguistic and Sociocultural StudiesLinguistic Variation and MorphologyLanguage, Discourse, Communication Strategies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 14 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Language, Race, and White Public Space

Open access
Hill, Jane H.·1998·American Anthropologist

Abstract

White public space is constructed through intense monitoring of racialized populations and the invisibility of similar signs in Whites; Mock Spanish reproduces negative racializing stereotypes of Chicanos and Latinos while indexing whiteness as an unmarked norm.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1525/aa.1998.100.3.680

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 14 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 21 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 13
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 12
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
23 of 23
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    'Whites' can be used as a shorthand category for the population that participates in White public space, despite heterogeneity.

    “I use”
1 of 1

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Conflicting dates for Warrior for Gringostroika

    Minor

    The note dates the same titled work to 1991, while the reference entry dates it to 1993.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 44 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Butler Judith, 1997, Excitable Speech
  2. Cmiel Kenneth, 1990, Democratic Eloquence
  3. Gibbs Nancy, 1996, An American Voice, Time, 149, 32
  4. Gomez‐Peña Guillermo, 1993, Warrior for Gringostroika
  5. Gubar Susan, 1997, Racechanges: White Skins, Black Face in American Culture
  6. Hewitt Roger, 1986, White Talk Black Talk, Inter‐Racial Friendship and Communication among Adolescents
  7. Hill Jane H., 1993, Is It Really “No Problemo”? In SALSA I: Proceedings of the First Annual Symposium about Language and Society—Austin. Robin Queen and Rusty Barrett, eds, Texas Linguistic Forum, 33, 1
  8. Kulick Don., 1993, Language Shift and Cultural Reproduction
  9. Labov William, 1972, Language in the Inner City
  10. Noriega Chon, 1997, Latin Looks, 85
  11. Penalosa Fernando, 1980, Chicano Sociolinguistics
  12. Rodriguez Clara E., 1997, Latin Looks, 73
  13. Urban Greg, 1991, A Discourse‐Centered Approach to Culture

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 970

Metadata

Authors
Hill, J. H.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Hill, Jane H.
Venue
American Anthropologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1998-09
Volume
100
Issue
3
Pages
680-689
ISSN
  • 0002-7294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-1433
OpenAlex
W1985344939
Cited by
972
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 83 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 85 · 2020: 115 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 13
FWCI
31.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
American Anthropologist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic Variation and Morphology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Keywords
African Americans, African American English, whiteness, indexicality, code-mixing, semiotics of language

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review