Cited by 388Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesMental Health Treatment and AccessSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Self-reported barriers to professional help seeking among college students at elevated risk for suicide

Open access
Czyz, Ewa K., Horwitz, Adam G., Eisenberg, Daniel, Kramer, Anne, King, Cheryl A.·2013·Journal of American College Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to describe self-reported barriers to professional help seeking among college students who are at elevated suicide risk and determine if these barriers vary by demographic and clinical characteristics. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were 165 non-treatment seekers recruited as part of a Web-based treatment linkage intervention for college students at elevated suicide risk (from September 2010 through December 2011). METHODS: Data were collected using Web-based questionnaires. Two coders coded students' responses to an open-ended question about reasons for not seeking professional help. RESULTS: The most commonly reported barriers included perception that treatment is not needed (66%), lack of time (26.8%), and preference for self-management (18%). Stigma was mentioned by only 12% of students. There were notable differences based on gender, race, and severity of depression and alcohol abuse. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts aimed at reaching students at elevated risk for suicidal behavior should be particularly sensitive to these commonly described barriers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07448481.2013.820731

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-help interventions have enormous potential to maximize scalability because of their low cost and flexibility in terms of the times in which they can be used, and their ability to overcome system-related barriers and attitudinal barriers.

    “Self-help interventions have enormous potential to maximize scalability because of their low cost and flexibility in terms of the times in which they can be used, and their ability to overcome system-related barriers (e.g. long waiting list) and attitudinal barriers (e.g. embarrassment, preference for self-management) (Czyz et al., 2013; Levin et al., 2016; Mains and Scogin, 2003).”

    From Effects of self-guided stress management interventions in college students: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2022) · cites this paper as Czyz et al., 2013

    The Comment section (page unavailable) identifies long wait lists, lack of time, and preference for self-management as barriers, and suggests that convenient web-based and self-help approaches might encourage help seeking. It does not establish that self-help interventions are low-cost or scalable, or that they overcome those barriers; it also suggests stigma may not be a primary barrier in this student population. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [16]Brownson C Burton A The nature of suicidal crises in college students: New data and implications 2007 American College Health Association Conference San Antonio, TX.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Czyz, E. K., Horwitz, A. G., Eisenberg, D., Kramer, A., & King, C. A.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Journal of American College Health
Published
2013-10
Volume
61
Issue
7
Pages
398-406
ISSN
  • 0164-4300 (ISSN-L)
  • 0744-8481
  • 1940-3208
OpenAlex
W1971324531
Cited by
388
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2
FWCI
10.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of American College Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Michigan
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R34MH083032)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
help-seeking barriers, suicide risk, university students, psychotherapy, stigma, depression severity, alcohol abuse, gender differences, racial differences, linkage to treatment
MeSH terms
Alcoholism, Depression, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Male, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Suicide, Attempted, Universities, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review