Cited by 186Menstrual Health and DisordersHypothalamic control of reproductive hormonesOvarian function and disorders

Allopregnanolone concentrations and premenstrual syndrome

Open access
Monteleone, P, Luisi, S, Tonetti, A, Bernardi, F, Genazzani, AD, Luisi, M, Petraglia, F, Genazzani, AR·2000·European Journal of Endocrinology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate basal allopregnanolone and progesterone in both phases of the menstrual cycle in women suffering from premenstrual syndrome (PMS) and their response to a GnRH test. DESIGN: We selected 56 women (28 patients with PMS and 28 controls) aged between 18 and 32 years. Blood samples were drawn in both follicular and phases. Twenty-eight women (14 patients with PMS and 14 controls) underwent a GnRH test in the luteal phase. METHODS: We evaluated allopregnanolone by RIA, using a specific antibody. Serum progesterone and oestradiol were determined using a commercially available RIA kit. RESULTS: Luteal phase allopregnanolone concentrations were significantly lower in patients with PMS than in controls. Progesterone concentrations were significantly lower in patients with PMS in both the follicular and the luteal phase. Serum oestradiol concentrations were in the normal range in both groups of women, although slightly greater in those with PMS. Allopregnanolone and progesterone responses to a GnRH test were significantly blunted in women with PMS. CONCLUSIONS: Diminished concentrations of allopregnanolone and progesterone, its precursor, and a blunted response to the GnRH test lead us to hypothesise that patients with PMS may suffer from an inadequate production of ovarian neuroactive steroids, especially in the luteal phase. This would lead to an impaired anxiolytic GABA(A)-mediated response in stressful physiological and psychological conditions, and may in part explain various psychoneuroendocrine symptoms that arise during PMS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1530/eje.0.1420269

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Monteleone, P., Luisi, S., Tonetti, A., Bernardi, F., Genazzani, A., Luisi, M., Petraglia, F., & Genazzani, A.
Affiliations
University of Pisa (IT)
Corresponding author
Genazzani, AR
Venue
European Journal of Endocrinology
Published
2000-03-01
Volume
142
Issue
3
Pages
269-273
ISSN
  • 0804-4643 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-683X
OpenAlex
W2119460554
Cited by
186
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
14.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • European Journal of Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Use Siena air (University of Siena) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
Keywords
allopregnanolone, premenstrual syndrome, progesterone, GnRH stimulation test, luteal phase, neurosteroids, ovarian steroidogenesis, estradiol, menstrual cycle
MeSH terms
Adult, Estradiol, Female, Follicular Phase, Humans, Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone, Luteal Phase, Menstrual Cycle, Pregnanolone, Premenstrual Syndrome, Progesterone, Radioimmunoassay, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review