Cited by 162Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchLong-Term Effects of COVID-19Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders

Adolescent Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Prevalence, Incidence, and Morbidity

Nijhof, Sanne L., Maijer, Kimberley, Bleijenberg, Gijs, Uiterwaal, Cuno S. P. M., Kimpen, Jan L. L., van de Putte, Elise M.·2011·Pediatrics

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine nationwide general practitioner (GP)-diagnosed prevalence and pediatrician–diagnosed incidence rates of adolescent chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), and to assess CFS morbidity. DESIGN AND SETTING: We collected data from a cross-sectional national sample among GPs and prospective registration of new patients with CFS in all pediatric hospital departments in the Netherlands. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Study participants were adolescents aged 10 to 18 years. A representative sample of GPs completed questionnaires on the prevalence of CFS in their adolescent patients. Pediatric hospital departments prospectively reported new cases of CFS in adolescent patients. For every new reported case, a questionnaire was sent to the reporting pediatrician and the reported patient to assess CFS morbidity. Prevalence was estimated through the data from GP questionnaires and incidence was estimated on the basis of cases newly reported by pediatricians from January to December 2008. RESULTS: Prevalence was calculated as 111 per 100 000 adolescents and incidence as 12 per 100 000 adolescents per year. Of newly reported patients with CFS, 91% scored at or above cutoff points for severe fatigue and 93% at or above the cutoff points for physical impairment. Forty-five percent of patients with CFS reported >50% school absence during the previous 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically diagnosed incidence and prevalence rates show that adolescent CFS is uncommon compared with chronic fatigue. The primary adverse impact of CFS is extreme disability associated with considerable school absence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2010-1147

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nijhof, S. L., Maijer, K., Bleijenberg, G., Uiterwaal, C. S. P. M., Kimpen, J. L. L., & van de Putte, E. M.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • Wilhelmina Children's Hospital (NL)
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • Department of Pediatrics, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, and
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2011-05-01
Volume
127
Issue
5
Pages
e1169-e1175
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2132523553
Cited by
162
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 10
FWCI
8.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
Keywords
chronic fatigue syndrome, adolescents, prevalence, incidence, morbidity, school absenteeism, physical impairment, disability, general practitioners
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Chronic Disease, Cross-Sectional Studies, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Male, Netherlands, Pediatrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic, Incidence, Prevalence, Sex Distribution, General Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review