Cited by 44Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsChronic Disease Management StrategiesMedicine, History, and Philosophy

The overlooked burden of persistent physical symptoms: a call for action in European healthcare

Open access
Toussaint, Anne, Weigel, Angelika, Löwe, Bernd, Blanch, Jordi, Bogaerts, Katleen, Boye, Birgitte, Burton, Chris, Cosci, Fiammetta +46 more·2025·The Lancet Regional Health - Europe

Abstract

Regardless of their cause, persistent physical symptoms are distressing somatic complaints that occur on most days for at least several months. They are common in patients with somatic diseases, functional somatic disorders, mental disorders, and undiagnosed medical conditions and are often associated with significant impairment and medical costs. Despite their prevalence and impact, persistent physical symptoms are often overlooked in medical care. This Personal View stresses the importance of recognising persistent physical symptoms as a European health issue. It advocates improvements in research, clinical management, public health, and policy. Efforts should prioritise integrating models of symptom perception and biopsychosocial perspectives into medical care and education, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration, and developing standardised guidelines to enhance patient care, reduce stigma, and improve clinical outcomes. Increased research funding can accelerate progress in understanding and effectively managing persistent physical symptoms. Addressing these priorities will support patients and healthcare professionals, ensuring adequate care and a higher quality of life for affected individuals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101140

Cites

116 of 116 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 118 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [117]Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Pain, Disability, and Chronic Illness Behavior Pain as a public health challenge 2011 National Academies Press (US)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Toussaint, A., Weigel, A., Löwe, B., Blanch, J., Bogaerts, K., Boye, B., Burton, C., Cosci, F., Engelmann, P., Fink, P., Fischer, S., Frisch, S., Frostholm, L., Gormsen, L. K., Greco, M., Kallesoe, K. H., Hartman, T. O., Hechler, T., Hennemann, S., Henningsen, P., Hüfner, K., Hüsing, P., Ronel, J., von Känel, R., Kenedi, C. A., Köteles, F., Kohlmann, S., Kop, W. J., Lehnen, N., Levenson, J., Löwe, B., Maehder, K., Martin, A., Pieh, C., Pitron, V., Rask, C. U., Rief, W., Rosendal, M., Rosmalen, J., Rymaszewska, J., Sainio, M., Salzmann, S., Schaefert, R., Selinheimo, S., Shedden-Mora, M., Stone, J., Tak, L., Toussaint, A., Uhlenbusch, N., Van den Bergh, O., de Vroege, L., Weigel, A., Werneke, U., & Witthöft, M.
Venue
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-01
Volume
48
Pages
101140
ISSN
2666-7762 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4404721348
Cited by
44
References
118
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 21
FWCI
3.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Regional Health - Europe (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Document Server@UHasselt (UHasselt) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) (submittedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Aarhus Universitet
  • Aarhus Universitetshospital
  • Philipps-Universität Marburg
  • Virginia Commonwealth University
  • Bergische Universität Wuppertal
  • Universitätsspital Basel
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (15/136/07)
  • European Commission (HORIZON2020, 956673)
  • University of Bath
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (RU 5211)
  • Rijksuniversiteit Groningen
  • Radboud Universiteit
  • Università degli Studi di Firenze
  • Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster
  • Technische Universität München
  • Universitat de Barcelona
  • Universität Zürich
  • Universiteit van Tilburg
  • Universitätsspital Zürich
  • Universiteit Hasselt
  • Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (956673)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
Keywords
persistent physical symptoms, somatic symptoms, functional somatic syndromes, biopsychosocial model, symptom perception, healthcare policy, clinical management, stigma, interdisciplinary collaboration, research funding, European healthcare

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review