Cited by 174Pregnancy and Medication ImpactMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects

Prenatal SSRI use and offspring with autism spectrum disorder or developmental delay

Open access
Harrington, Rebecca A., Lee, Li-Ching, Crum, Rosa M., Zimmerman, Andrew W., Hertz-Picciotto, Irva·2014·Pediatrics

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine associations between prenatal use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and the odds of autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) and other developmental delays (DDs). METHODS: A total of 966 mother-child pairs were evaluated (492 ASD, 154 DD, 320 typical development [TD]) from the Childhood Autism Risks from Genetics and the Environment (CHARGE) Study, a population-based case-control study. Standardized measures confirmed developmental status. Interviews with biological mothers ascertained prenatal SSRI use, maternal mental health history, and sociodemographic information. RESULTS: Overall, prevalence of prenatal SSRI exposure was lowest in TD children (3.4%) but did not differ significantly from ASD (5.9%) or DD (5.2%) children. Among boys, prenatal SSRI exposure was nearly 3 times as likely in children with ASD relative to TD (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 2.91; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07–7.93); the strongest association occurred with first-trimester exposure (OR: 3.22; 95% CI: 1.17–8.84). Exposure was also elevated among boys with DD (OR: 3.39; 95% CI: 0.98–11.75) and was strongest in the third trimester (OR: 4.98; 95% CI: 1.20–20.62). Findings were similar among mothers with an anxiety or mood disorder history. CONCLUSIONS: In boys, prenatal exposure to SSRIs may increase susceptibility to ASD or DD. Findings from published studies on SSRIs and ASD continues to be inconsistent. Potential recall bias and residual confounding by indication are concerns. Larger samples are needed to replicate DD results. Because maternal depression itself carries risks for the fetus, the benefits of prenatal SSRI use should be carefully weighed against potential harms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1542/peds.2013-3406

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Sparrow SS, Balla DA, Cicchetti DV. Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales Interview Edition Expanded Form. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service, Inc; 1984
  2. Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. Validity in epidemiologic studies. In: Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL, eds. Modern Epide- miology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008:128-147

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harrington, R. A., Lee, L.-C., Crum, R. M., Zimmerman, A. W., & Hertz-Picciotto, I.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
  • Department of Public Health Sciences and the MIND Institute, University of California, Davis, Davis, California
Venue
Pediatrics
Published
2014-05-01
Volume
133
Issue
5
Pages
e1241-e1248
ISSN
  • 0031-4005 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-4275
OpenAlex
W2105930613
Cited by
174
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 7
FWCI
26.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PEDIATRICS (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Autism Speaks
  • National Institutes of Health (ES11269)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES015359, P01ES011269)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Keywords
prenatal SSRI exposure, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, autism spectrum disorder, developmental delay, maternal mental health, maternal depression, first trimester exposure, third trimester exposure, sex differences, CHARGE study, maternal medication use
MeSH terms
California, Developmental Disabilities, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Child, Preschool, Drug Utilization, Female, Humans, Male, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Pregnancy Trimester, Third, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Sex Factors, Odds Ratio, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review