Cited by 29Wildlife-Road Interactions and ConservationSoil and Land Suitability AnalysisLandslides and related hazards

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Tilt – Slope-Dependent Least Cost Path Calculations Revisited

Open access
(:Unkn) Unknown·2011·Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.15496/publikation-2095

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effects of horizontal and vertical error on cost surfaces and LCPs are rarely discussed, with few exceptions.

    “Whilst the impact of DEM resolution on the cost surface and the LCP has been explored (e.g.Branting, 2012;Harris, 2000;Herzog, 2014a), the effects of horizontal and vertical error are rarely discussed (for exceptions see Herzog & Posluschny, 2011;Herzog & Yépez, 2015a, 2015b;Verhagen et al., 2019).”

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Unknown, (.
Venue
Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen
Publisher
Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen
Published
2011
OpenAlex
W2976558840
Cited by
29
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Soil and Land Suitability Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Landslides and related hazards
Keywords
least-cost path, slope, digital elevation model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review