The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dex-Net 2.0: Deep Learning to Plan Robust Grasps with Synthetic Point Clouds and Analytic Grasp Metrics
Open accessAbstract
To reduce data collection time for deep learning of robust robotic grasp plans, we explore training from a synthetic dataset of 6.7 million point clouds, grasps, and analytic grasp metrics generated from thousands of 3D models from Dex-Net 1.0 in randomized poses on a table.We use the resulting dataset, Dex-Net 2.0, to train a Grasp Quality Convolutional Neural Network (GQ-CNN) model that rapidly predicts the probability of success of grasps from depth images, where grasps are specified as the planar position, angle, and depth of a gripper relative to an RGB-D sensor.Experiments with over 1,000 trials on an ABB YuMi comparing grasp planning methods on singulated objects suggest that a GQ-CNN trained with only synthetic data from Dex-Net 2.0 can be used to plan grasps in 0.8s with a success rate of 93% on eight known objects with adversarial geometry and is 3× faster than registering point clouds to a precomputed dataset of objects and indexing grasps.The Dex-Net 2.0 grasp planner also has the highest success rate on a dataset of 10 novel rigid objects and achieves 99% precision (one false positive out of 69 grasps classified as robust) on a dataset of 40 novel household objects, some of which are articulated or deformable.Code, datasets, videos, and supplementary material are available at http://berkeleyautomation.github.io/dex-net.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection
Dalal, N., & Triggs, B. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.177 · Cited by 33,584
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5 · Cited by 24,162
Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision
Hartley, R., & Zisserman, A. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511811685 · Cited by 21,070
Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.123 · Cited by 19,741
TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems
Abadi, M., Agarwal, A., Barham, P., Brevdo, E., Chen, Z., Citro, C., Corrado, G. S., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., et al. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1603.04467 · Cited by 9,408
Levine, S., Pastor, P., Krizhevsky, A., Ibarz, J., & Quillen, D. (2018) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364917710318 · Cited by 1,971
Target-driven visual navigation in indoor scenes using deep reinforcement learning
Zhu, Y., Mottaghi, R., Kolve, E., Lim, J. J., Gupta, A., Fei-Fei, L., & Farhadi, A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra.2017.7989381 · Cited by 1,533
SLAM++: Simultaneous Localisation and Mapping at the Level of Objects
Salas-Moreno, R. F., Newcombe, R. A., Strasdat, H., Kelly, P. H. J., & Davison, A. J. (2013) · 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2013.178 · Cited by 945
Cited by
Learning dexterous in-hand manipulation
Andrychowicz, O. M., Baker, B., Chociej, M., Józefowicz, R., McGrew, B., Pachocki, J., Petron, A., Plappert, M., Powell, G., Ray, A., et al. (2020) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364919887447 · Cited by 1,643
Deep Reinforcement Learning: An Overview
Li, Y. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1701.07274 · Cited by 762
GraspNet-1Billion: A Large-Scale Benchmark for General Object Grasping
Fang, H.-S., Wang, C., Gou, M., & Lu, C. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01146 · Cited by 683
Using Simulation and Domain Adaptation to Improve Efficiency of Deep Robotic Grasping
Bousmalis, K., Irpan, A., Wohlhart, P., Bai, Y., Kelcey, M., Kalakrishnan, M., Downs, L., Ibarz, J., Pastor, P., Konolige, K., et al. (2018) · 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra.2018.8460875 · Cited by 636
A Survey of Deep Learning: Platforms, Applications and Emerging Research Trends
Hatcher, W. G., & Yu, W. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2830661 · Cited by 654
Metadata
- Authors
- Mahler, J., Liang, J., Niyaz, S., Laskey, M., Doan, R., Liu, X., Aparicio, J., & Goldberg, K.
- Venue
- Robotics: Science and Systems XIII
- Published
- 2017-07-12
- OpenAlex
- W2600030077
- Cited by
- 1,268
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 174.80
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dex-Net 2.0: Deep Learning to Plan Robust Grasps with Synthetic Point Clouds and Analytic Grasp Metrics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.15607/rss.2017.xiii.058
- The paper
- Mahler, J., Liang, J., Niyaz, S., Laskey, M., Doan, R., Liu, X., Aparicio, J., & Goldberg, K. (2017). Dex-Net 2.0: Deep Learning to Plan Robust Grasps with Synthetic Point Clouds and Analytic Grasp Metrics. Robotics: Science and Systems XIII. https://doi.org/10.15607/rss.2017.xiii.058
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
