The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dex-Net 2.0: Deep Learning to Plan Robust Grasps with Synthetic Point Clouds and Analytic Grasp Metrics
Open accessAbstract
To reduce data collection time for deep learning of robust robotic grasp plans, we explore training from a synthetic dataset of 6.7 million point clouds, grasps, and analytic grasp metrics generated from thousands of 3D models from Dex-Net 1.0 in randomized poses on a table.We use the resulting dataset, Dex-Net 2.0, to train a Grasp Quality Convolutional Neural Network (GQ-CNN) model that rapidly predicts the probability of success of grasps from depth images, where grasps are specified as the planar position, angle, and depth of a gripper relative to an RGB-D sensor.Experiments with over 1,000 trials on an ABB YuMi comparing grasp planning methods on singulated objects suggest that a GQ-CNN trained with only synthetic data from Dex-Net 2.0 can be used to plan grasps in 0.8s with a success rate of 93% on eight known objects with adversarial geometry and is 3× faster than registering point clouds to a precomputed dataset of objects and indexing grasps.The Dex-Net 2.0 grasp planner also has the highest success rate on a dataset of 10 novel rigid objects and achieves 99% precision (one false positive out of 69 grasps classified as robust) on a dataset of 40 novel household objects, some of which are articulated or deformable.Code, datasets, videos, and supplementary material are available at http://berkeleyautomation.github.io/dex-net.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection
Dalal, N., & Triggs, B. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.177 · Cited by 33,584
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5 · Cited by 24,162
Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision
Hartley, R., & Zisserman, A. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511811685 · Cited by 21,070
Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.123 · Cited by 19,741
TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems
Abadi, M., Agarwal, A., Barham, P., Brevdo, E., Chen, Z., Citro, C., Corrado, G. S., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., et al. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1603.04467 · Cited by 9,408
Levine, S., Pastor, P., Krizhevsky, A., Ibarz, J., & Quillen, D. (2018) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364917710318 · Cited by 1,971
Target-driven visual navigation in indoor scenes using deep reinforcement learning
Zhu, Y., Mottaghi, R., Kolve, E., Lim, J. J., Gupta, A., Fei-Fei, L., & Farhadi, A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra.2017.7989381 · Cited by 1,533
SLAM++: Simultaneous Localisation and Mapping at the Level of Objects
Salas-Moreno, R. F., Newcombe, R. A., Strasdat, H., Kelly, P. H. J., & Davison, A. J. (2013) · 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2013.178 · Cited by 945
Cited by
Learning dexterous in-hand manipulation
Andrychowicz, O. M., Baker, B., Chociej, M., Józefowicz, R., McGrew, B., Pachocki, J., Petron, A., Plappert, M., Powell, G., Ray, A., et al. (2020) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364919887447 · Cited by 1,643
Deep Reinforcement Learning: An Overview
Li, Y. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1701.07274 · Cited by 762
GraspNet-1Billion: A Large-Scale Benchmark for General Object Grasping
Fang, H.-S., Wang, C., Gou, M., & Lu, C. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01146 · Cited by 683
Using Simulation and Domain Adaptation to Improve Efficiency of Deep Robotic Grasping
Bousmalis, K., Irpan, A., Wohlhart, P., Bai, Y., Kelcey, M., Kalakrishnan, M., Downs, L., Ibarz, J., Pastor, P., Konolige, K., et al. (2018) · 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra.2018.8460875 · Cited by 636
A Survey of Deep Learning: Platforms, Applications and Emerging Research Trends
Hatcher, W. G., & Yu, W. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2830661 · Cited by 654
Learning Synergies Between Pushing and Grasping with Self-Supervised Deep Reinforcement Learning
Zeng, A., Song, S., Welker, S., Lee, J., Rodriguez, A., & Funkhouser, T. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2018.8593986 · Cited by 606
Solving Rubik's Cube with a Robot Hand
OpenAI, Akkaya, I., Andrychowicz, M., Chociej, M., Litwin, M., McGrew, B., Petron, A., Paino, A., Plappert, M., Powell, G., et al. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.07113 · Cited by 602
Learning Joint Reconstruction of Hands and Manipulated Objects
Hasson, Y., Varol, G., Tzionas, D., Kalevatykh, I., Black, M. J., Laptev, I., & Schmid, C. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.01208 · Cited by 513
Zeng, A., Song, S., Yu, K.-T., Donlon, E., Hogan, F. R., Bauza, M., Ma, D., Taylor, O., Liu, M., Romo, E., et al. (2018) · 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra.2018.8461044 · Cited by 441
James, S., Wohlhart, P., Kalakrishnan, M., Kalashnikov, D., Irpan, A., Ibarz, J., Levine, S., Hadsell, R., & Bousmalis, K. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.01291 · Cited by 420
(2021) · doi:10.1109/icra48506.2021.9561877 · Cited by 370
TossingBot: Learning to Throw Arbitrary Objects With Residual Physics
Zeng, A., Song, S., Lee, J., Rodriguez, A., & Funkhouser, T. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2020.2988642 · Cited by 282
RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Control
Brohan, A., Brown, N., Carbajal, J., Chebotar, Y., Chen, X., Choromanski, K., Ding, T., Driess, D., Dubey, A., Finn, C., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.15818 · Cited by 276
“By doing so, prior methods have demonstrated how robots can generalize to novel object instances [31, 34, 32, 35, 36], to tasks involving novel combinations of objects and skills [37, 38, 39, 40, 41], to new goals or language instructions [42, 43, 41, 44, 45, 46, 47], to tasks with novel semantic…”
BackgroundLearning Dexterous In-Hand Manipulation
OpenAI, Andrychowicz, M., Baker, B., Chociej, M., Jozefowicz, R., McGrew, B., Pachocki, J., Petron, A., Plappert, M., Powell, G., et al. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1808.00177 · Cited by 248
Open X-Embodiment: Robotic Learning Datasets and RT-X Models : Open X-Embodiment Collaboration 0
O’Neill, A., Rehman, A., Maddukuri, A., Gupta, A., Padalkar, A., Lee, A., Pooley, A., Gupta, A., Mandlekar, A., Jain, A., et al. (2024) · 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra57147.2024.10611477 · Cited by 210
Self-citationGrasping in the Wild: Learning 6DoF Closed-Loop Grasping From Low-Cost Demonstrations
Song, S., Zeng, A., Lee, J., & Funkhouser, T. (2020) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2020.3004787 · Cited by 185
Deep learning in robotics: survey on model structures and training strategies
Karoly, A. I., Galambos, P., Kuti, J., & Rudas, I. J. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems · doi:10.1109/tsmc.2020.3018325 · Cited by 146
ROBOTURK: A Crowdsourcing Platform for Robotic Skill Learning through Imitation
Mandlekar, A., Zhu, Y., Garg, A., Booher, J., Spero, M., Tung, A., Gao, J., Emmons, J., Gupta, A., Orbay, E., et al. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1811.02790 · Cited by 134
Navigating to objects in the real world
Gervet, T., Chintala, S., Batra, D., Malik, J., & Chaplot, D. S. (2023) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.adf6991 · Cited by 125
ContactGrasp: Functional Multi-finger Grasp Synthesis from Contact
Brahmbhatt, S., Handa, A., Hays, J., & Fox, D. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros40897.2019.8967960 · Cited by 125
Synergies Between Affordance and Geometry: 6-DoF Grasp Detection via Implicit Representations
Jiang, Z., Zhu, Y., Svetlik, M., Fang, K., & Zhu, Y. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.01542 · Cited by 122
Synergies Between Affordance and Geometry: 6-DoF Grasp Detection via Implicit Representations
Jiang, Z., Zhu, Y., Svetlik, M., Fang, K., & Zhu, Y. (2021) · Robotics: Science and Systems XVII · doi:10.15607/rss.2021.xvii.024 · Cited by 122
Learning Rope Manipulation Policies Using Dense Object Descriptors Trained on Synthetic Depth Data
Sundaresan, P., Grannen, J., Thananjeyan, B., Balakrishna, A., Laskey, M., Stone, K., Gonzalez, J. E., & Goldberg, K. (2020) · 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra40945.2020.9197121 · Cited by 107
Self-citationDitto: Building Digital Twins of Articulated Objects from Interaction
Jiang, Z., Hsu, C.-C., & Zhu, Y. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.00553 · Cited by 92
Tanwani, A. K., Mor, N., Kubiatowicz, J., Gonzalez, J. E., & Goldberg, K. (2019) · 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra.2019.8793690 · Cited by 87
Self-citationAugmenting Reinforcement Learning with Behavior Primitives for Diverse Manipulation Tasks
Nasiriany, S., Liu, H., & Zhu, Y. (2022) · 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra46639.2022.9812140 · Cited by 91
Fujita, M., Domae, Y., Noda, A., Garcia Ricardez, G. A., Nagatani, T., Zeng, A., Song, S., Rodriguez, A., Causo, A., Chen, I. M., et al. (2019) · Advanced Robotics · doi:10.1080/01691864.2019.1698463 · Cited by 78
You Only Demonstrate Once: Category-Level Manipulation from Single Visual Demonstration
Wen, B., Lian, W., Bekris, K., & Schaal, S. (2022) · Robotics: Science and Systems XVIII · doi:10.15607/rss.2022.xviii.044 · Cited by 70
Hundt, A., Killeen, B., Greene, N., Wu, H., Kwon, H., Paxton, C., & Hager, G. D. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.11730 · Cited by 59
Yuan, W., Hang, K., Kragic, D., Wang, M. Y., & Stork, J. A. (2019) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2019.06.007 · Cited by 54
A Fog Robotic System for Dynamic Visual Servoing
Tian, N., Chen, J., Ma, M., Zhang, R., Huang, B., Goldberg, K., & Sojoudi, S. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1809.06716 · Cited by 49
Self-citationMandlekar, A., Booher, J., Spero, M., Tung, A., Gupta, A., Zhu, Y., Garg, A., Savarese, S., & Fei-Fei, L. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.04052 · Cited by 48
(2023) · doi:10.1109/iros55552.2023.10341379 · Cited by 48
Language-driven Grasp Detection
Vuong, A. D., Vu, M. N., Huang, B., Nguyen, N., Le, H., Vo, T., & Nguyen, A. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01695 · Cited by 39
Learning Affordance Landscapes for Interaction Exploration in 3D Environments
Nagarajan, T., & Grauman, K. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.09241 · Cited by 38
ManiSkill: Generalizable Manipulation Skill Benchmark with Large-Scale Demonstrations
Mu, T., Ling, Z., Xiang, F., Yang, D., Li, X., Tao, S., Huang, Z., Jia, Z., & Su, H. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.14483 · Cited by 34
Learning robots to grasp by demonstration
De Coninck, E., Verbelen, T., Van Molle, P., Simoens, P., & Dhoedt, B. (2020) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2020.103474 · Cited by 34
ReLMoGen: Leveraging Motion Generation in Reinforcement Learning for Mobile Manipulation
Xia, F., Li, C., Martín-Martín, R., Litany, O., Toshev, A., & Savarese, S. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.07792 · Cited by 33
Sim-to-Real Transfer of Accurate Grasping with Eye-In-Hand Observations and Continuous Control
Yan, M., Frosio, I., Tyree, S., & Kautz, J. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1712.03303 · Cited by 31
Human Hands as Probes for Interactive Object Understanding
Goyal, M., Modi, S., Goyal, R., & Gupta, S. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.00329 · Cited by 31
Action Image Representation: Learning Scalable Deep Grasping Policies with Zero Real World Data
Khansari, M., Kappler, D., Luo, J., Bingham, J., & Kalakrishnan, M. (2020) · 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra40945.2020.9197415 · Cited by 23
Conformal Decision Theory: Safe Autonomous Decisions from Imperfect Predictions
Lekeufack, J., Angelopoulos, A. N., Bajcsy, A., Jordan, M. I., & Malik, J. (2024) · 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra57147.2024.10610041 · Cited by 18
Evaluating Real-World Robot Manipulation Policies in Simulation
Li, X., Hsu, K., Gu, J., Pertsch, K., Mees, O., Walke, H. R., Fu, C., Lunawat, I., Sieh, I., Kirmani, S., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.05941 · Cited by 4
GenAug: Retargeting behaviors to unseen situations via Generative Augmentation
Chen, Z., Kiami, S., Gupta, A., & Kumar, V. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.06671 · Cited by 2
Comparing Task Simplifications to Learn Closed-Loop Object Picking Using Deep Reinforcement Learning
Breyer, M., Furrer, F., Novkovic, T., Siegwart, R., & Nieto, J. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1803.04996 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Mahler, J., Liang, J., Niyaz, S., Laskey, M., Doan, R., Liu, X., Aparicio, J., & Goldberg, K.
- Venue
- Robotics: Science and Systems XIII
- Published
- 2017-07-12
- OpenAlex
- W2600030077
- Cited by
- 1,268
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 174.80
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
