Cited by 70Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Pharmacology of human experimental anxiety

Open access
Graeff, F.G., Parente, A., Del-Ben, C.M., Guimarães, F.S.·2003·Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research

Abstract

This review covers the effect of drugs affecting anxiety using four psychological procedures for inducing experimental anxiety applied to healthy volunteers and patients with anxiety disorders. The first is aversive conditioning of the skin conductance responses to tones. The second is simulated public speaking, which consists of speaking in front of a video camera, with anxiety being measured with psychometric scales. The third is the Stroop Color-Word test, in which words naming colors are painted in the same or in a different shade, the incongruence generating a cognitive conflict. The last test is a human version of a thoroughly studied animal model of anxiety, fear-potentiated startle, in which the eye-blink reflex to a loud noise is recorded. The evidence reviewed led to the conclusion that the aversive conditioning and potentiated startle tests are based on classical conditioning of anticipatory anxiety. Their sensitivity to benzodiazepine anxiolytics suggests that these models generate an emotional state related to generalized anxiety disorder. On the other hand, the increase in anxiety determined by simulated public speaking is resistant to benzodiazepines and sensitive to drugs affecting serotonergic neurotransmission. This pharmacological profile, together with epidemiological evidence indicating its widespread prevalence, suggests that the emotional state generated by public speaking represents a species-specific response that may be related to social phobia and panic disorder. Because of scant pharmacological data, the status of the Stroop Color-Word test remains uncertain. In spite of ethical and economic constraints, human experimental anxiety constitutes a valuable tool for the study of the pathophysiology of anxiety disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/s0100-879x2003000400003

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SPST has apparent and predictive validity for SAD because fear of speaking in public is a cardinal manifestation of SAD, and pharmacological evidence shows response pattern to some substances in SPST is similar to clinical response in SAD.

    “SPST has apparent and predictive validity for SAD because the fear of speaking in public is a cardinal manifestation of SAD, and there is pharmacological evidence that the response pattern to some substances in the SPST is similar to the clinical response presented by patients with SAD (Graeff et al, 2003; Brunello et al, 2000).”

    From Cannabidiol Reduces the Anxiety Induced by Simulated Public Speaking in Treatment-Naïve Social Phobia Patients (2011) · cites this paper as Graeff et al, 2003

    The Simulated public speaking section (page not specified) calls public-speaking fear the most frequent social fear and says it is intensified in social phobia. The Conclusion (page not specified) links the test’s pharmacological profile to social phobia, but cautiously says the response may be related to it; it does not establish that responses to substances in the test match clinical responses in patients with social anxiety disorder. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Connel J, Hellewell JSE & Deakin JFW (1994). Effects of a 5HT2c agonist in two models of anxiety in volunteers. Journal of Psycho- pharmacology, 8: A23 (Abstract).
  2. Graeff FG (1988). Animal model of aversion. In: Simon P, Soubrié P & Willocher D (Editors), Animal Models of Psychiatric Disorders. Vol. 1. Karger, Basel, Switzerland, 115-141.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Graeff, F. G., Parente, A., Del-Ben, C. M., & Guimarães, F. S.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • Universidade de São Paulo
Venue
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
Published
2003-04
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
421-432
ISSN
0100-879X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999737192
Cited by
70
References
58
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
anxiety disorders, benzodiazepine anxiolytics, serotonergic neurotransmission, aversive conditioning, skin conductance, fear-potentiated startle, blink reflex, Stroop task, anticipatory anxiety, generalized anxiety disorder, social anxiety disorder, panic disorder, animal models of anxiety
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Color Perception, Conditioning, Classical, Galvanic Skin Response, Humans, Speech, Reflex, Startle, Test Anxiety Scale, Anti-Anxiety Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review