Cited by 285Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Serotonin, the periaqueductal gray and panic

Graeff, Frederico G·2004·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

This article reviews experimental evidence and theoretical constructs that implicate serotonin (5-HT) modulation of defensive behavior within the midbrain periaqueductal gray in panic disorder (PD). Evidence with conflict tests in experimental animals indicates that 5-HT enhances anxiety, whereas results with aversive stimulation of the dorsal periaqueductal gray point to an anxiolytic role of 5-HT. To solve this contradiction, it has been suggested that the emotional states determined by the two types of animal model are different. Conflict tests would generate conditioned anxiety, whereas periaqueductal gray stimulation would produce unconditioned fear, as evoked by proximal threat. Clinically, the former would be related to generalized anxiety while the latter to PD. Thus, 5-HT is supposed to facilitate anxiety, but to inhibit panic. This hypothesis has been tested in the animal model of anxiety and panic named the elevated T-maze, in two procedures of human experimental anxiety applied to healthy volunteers or panic patients, and in CO2-induced panic attacks. Overall, the obtained results have shown that drugs that enhance 5-HT function increase different indexes of anxiety, but decrease indexes of panic. Drugs that impair 5-HT function have the opposite effects. Thus, so far the predictions derived from the above hypothesis have been fulfilled.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2003.12.004

Cites

145 of 145 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Graeff, F. G.
Affiliations
Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Corresponding author
Graeff, Frederico G
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-05
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
239-259
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2143184913
Cited by
285
References
144
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 17
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
serotonin, periaqueductal gray, panic disorder, defensive behavior, anxiety, elevated T-maze, conditioned anxiety, unconditioned fear, anxiolytic effects, generalized anxiety disorder
MeSH terms
Animals, Anxiety, Brain Mapping, Conflict, Psychological, Escape Reaction, Humans, Models, Psychological, Periaqueductal Gray, Serotonin, Panic Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review