Cited by 83Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative DiseasesNeurological Disorders and Treatments

Neuroprotective strategies in Alzheimer’s disease

Open access
Longo, Frank M., Massa, Stephen M.·2004·NeuroRx

Abstract

In addition to strategies designed to decrease amyloid beta (A beta) levels, it is likely that successful Alzheimer's disease (AD) therapeutic regimens will require the concomitant application of neuroprotective agents. Elucidation of pathophysiological processes occurring in AD and identification of the molecular targets mediating these processes point to potential high-yield neuroprotective strategies. Candidate neuroprotective agents include those that interact specifically with neuronal targets to inhibit deleterious intraneuronal mechanisms triggered by A beta and other toxic stimuli. Strategies include creating small molecules that block A beta interactions with cell surface and intracellular targets, down-regulate stress kinase signaling cascades, block activation of caspases and expression of pro-apoptotic proteins, and inhibit enzymes mediating excessive tau protein phosphorylation. Additional potential neuroprotective compounds include those that counteract loss of cholinergic function, promote the trophic state and plasticity of neurons, inhibit accumulation of reactive oxygen species, and block excitotoxicity. Certain categories of compounds, such as neurotrophins or neurotrophin small molecule mimetics, have the potential to alter neuronal signaling patterns such that several of these target actions might be achieved by a single agent.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1602/neurorx.1.1.117

Cites

120 of 120 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Longo, F. M., & Massa, S. M.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • San Francisco VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Longo, Frank M.
Venue
NeuroRx
Published
2004-01
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
117-127
ISSN
1545-5343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2014865029
Cited by
83
References
120
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroRx (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Alzheimer's Association
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG009873, R01-AG09873)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, neuroprotection, amyloid-beta, neuroprotective agents, caspase inhibition, apoptosis, tau phosphorylation, cholinergic dysfunction, reactive oxygen species, excitotoxicity, neurotrophins, small molecule mimetics, neuroplasticity
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Brain, Humans, Signal Transduction, Neuroprotective Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review