The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Reader-to-Leader Framework: Motivating Technology-Mediated Social Participation
Open accessAbstract
Billions of people participate in online social activities. Most users participate as readers of discussion boards, searchers of blog posts, or viewers of photos. A fraction of users become contributors of user-generated content by writing consumer product reviews, uploading travel photos, or expressing political opinions. Some users move beyond such individual efforts to become collaborators, forming tightly connected groups with lively discussions whose outcome might be a Wikipedia article or a carefully edited YouTube video. A small fraction of users becomes leaders, who participate in governance by setting and upholding policies, repairing vandalized materials, or mentoring novices. We analyze these activities and offer the Reader-to-Leader Framework with the goal of helping researchers, designers, and managers understand what motivates technology-mediated social participation. This will enable them to improve interface design and social support for their companies, government agencies, and non-governmental organizations. These improvements could reduce the number of failed projects, while accelerating the application of social media for national priorities such as healthcare, energy sustainability, emergency response, economic development, education, and more.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Social loafing: a meta-analytic review and theoretical integration.
Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.681 · Cited by 2,196
Commons-based Peer Production and Virtue
Benkler, Y., & Nissenbaum, H. (2006) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00235.x · Cited by 890 · cited 2×
“Further, Benkler and Nissenbaum (2006) advocate “virtue” in an article entitled “Commons-based peer production and virtue.””
Cited by
Kittur, A., Nickerson, J. V., Bernstein, M., Gerber, E., Shaw, A., Zimmerman, J., Lease, M., & Horton, J. (2013) · Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work · doi:10.1145/2441776.2441923 · Cited by 1,034
Content or Community? A Digital Business Strategy for Content Providers in the Social Age1
Oestreicher-Singer, G., & Zalmanson, L. (2013) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2013/37.2.12 · Cited by 422
Wang, Y.-C., Kraut, R., & Levine, J. M. (2012) · Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work · doi:10.1145/2145204.2145329 · Cited by 282
The Civic Labor of Volunteer Moderators Online
Matias, J. N. (2019) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305119836778 · Cited by 183
Advancing the application, quality and harmonization of implementation science measures
Rabin, B. A., Purcell, P., Naveed, S., Moser, R. P., Henton, M. D., Proctor, E. K., Brownson, R. C., & Glasgow, R. E. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-119 · Cited by 106
Goals and Tasks: Two Typologies of Citizen Science Projects
Wiggins, A., & Crowston, K. (2012) · 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.1109/hicss.2012.295 · Cited by 93
Meta-design: Transforming and Enriching the Design and Use of Socio-technical Systems
Fischer, G., & Herrmann, T. (2015) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-6720-4_6 · Cited by 50
Factors motivating citizen engagement in mobile sensing: Insights from a survey of non-participants
Leao, S., & Izadpahani, P. (2016) · Journal of Urban Technology · doi:10.1080/10630732.2016.1175824 · Cited by 26
"Taking Care of a Fruit Tree": Nurturing as a Layer of Concern in Online Community Moderation
Yu, B., Seering, J., Spiel, K., & Watts, L. (2020) · Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3334480.3383009 · Cited by 22
On leaders’ presence: interactions and influences within online communities
Panteli, N. (2016) · Behaviour & Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2016.1144084 · Cited by 20
Social networking in an academic conference context: insights from a case study
Levy, M., Hadar, I., Te'eni, D., Unkelos-Shpigel, N., Sherman, S., & Harel, N. (2016) · Information Technology & People · doi:10.1108/itp-09-2014-0220 · Cited by 16
Death by AI: Will large language models diminish Wikipedia?
Wagner, C., & Jiang, L. (2025) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24975 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- University of Maryland, Preece, J., Shneiderman, B., & University of Maryland
- Venue
- AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction
- Publisher
- Association for Information Systems
- Published
- 2009-03-31
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-32
- ISSN
- 1944-3900 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2150461333
- Cited by
- 675
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 174.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.