The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
NEET Youth in the Aftermath of the Crisis: Challenges and Policies
Abstract
This paper presents an overview of the situation of youth in OECD countries since the onset of the financial crisis focusing primarily on describing the characteristics and living conditions of youth not in employment, education or training (the ‘NEETs’). It also provides data on the availability, coverage and effectiveness of income-support policies for young people, and summarises available evidence on the impact of interventions that aim at improving the social, education and employment situation of the most disadvantaged youth. Due to the paper’s explicit focus on the hardest-to-place, most disadvantaged youth, the range of policies covered is broader than in earlier studies on the same topic, including various social benefits and in-kind services targeted at this group. The paper shows that NEET rates have not yet recovered from the crisis. There are large differences in youth unemployment and inactivity across countries, and these differences were further exacerbated by the recession. Reducing NEET rates is a great challenge for governments, as youth who remain jobless for long periods typically come from more disadvantaged backgrounds, have low levels of educational attainment, and are in many cases inactive. There is substantial evidence, however, that even the most disadvantaged youth can benefit from a variety of targeted interventions, including for instance special education programmes and mentoring.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The effects of cognitive and noncognitive abilities on labor market outcomes and social behavior
Heckman, J. J., Stixrud, J., & Urzua, S. (2006) · Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1086/504455 · Cited by 4,427
A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance.
Poropat, A. E. (2009) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0014996 · Cited by 2,729
Roberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x · Cited by 2,361
Understanding the Black-White Test Score Gap in the First Two Years of School
Fryer, R. G., & Levitt, S. D. (2004) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/003465304323031049 · Cited by 936
Recursive Processes in Self-Affirmation: Intervening to Close the Minority Achievement Gap
Cohen, G. L., Garcia, J., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Apfel, N., & Brzustoski, P. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1170769 · Cited by 800
The Black-White Test Score Gap Through Third Grade
Fryer, R. G. (2006) · American Law and Economics Review · doi:10.1093/aler/ahl003 · Cited by 422
John, O. P., Caspi, A., Robins, R. W., Moffitt, T. E., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1994) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1131373 · Cited by 412
Goldberg, L. R., Sweeney, D., Merenda, P. F., & Hughes, J. E. (1998) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(97)00110-4 · Cited by 378
Improving youth mentoring interventions through research-based practice
Rhodes, J. E. (2008) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10464-007-9153-9 · Cited by 272
The Non-Cognitive Returns to Class Size
Dee, T., & West, M. (2008) · doi:10.3386/w13994 · Cited by 174
Metadata
- Venue
- OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers
- Published
- 2015-02-26
- ISSN
- 1815-199X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3125516056
- Cited by
- 350
- References
- 11
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NEET Youth in the Aftermath of the Crisis: Challenges and Policies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1787/5js6363503f6-en
- The paper
- NEET Youth in the Aftermath of the Crisis: Challenges and Policies. (2015). OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers. https://doi.org/10.1787/5js6363503f6-en
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.