Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 55Disability Rights and RepresentationFeminist Theory and Gender StudiesGender, Health, and Social Inequality

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Charting Relations between Intersectionality Theory and the Neurodiversity Paradigm

Open access
Strand, Lauren Rose·2017·Disability Studies Quarterly
DOI 10.18061/dsq.v37i2.5374
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This essay explores central elements and applications of intersectionality theory and the neurodiversity paradigm. First, the histories and tenets of intersectionality theory and neurodiversity paradigm are provided. Then, areas are explored where each of the two approaches might further engage with the principles of the other. Finally, the essay concludes by broadly considering the efforts made by the Black Lives Matter movement and the Autistic Self Advocacy Network to bring attention to and end police violence as both networks employ and attend to elements of intersectionality and neurodiversity. The way these two networks draw on both intersectionality and neurodiversity to further their mission could be a possible site for scholars to consider in the interest of advancing dialogues between intersectionality theory and the neurodiversity paradigm. Ultimately, the essay calls for a continued exploration of the potentials for intersectionality and neurodiversity to complement and complicate one another, both in terms of theoretical development and coalition building.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18061/dsq.v37i2.5374

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. American Psychological Association (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  2. Artiles, A. J. (2013). Untangling the racialization of disabilities: An intersectionality critique across disability models. W. E. B. Du Bois Institute for African and African American Research, 10(2), 329-347. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1742058x13000271 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Beale, F. (1970). "Double jeopardy: To be black and female." In T. C. Bambara (Ed.), The black woman: An anthology (pp. 109-122). New York, NY: New American Library.
  4. Bell, C. (2010). "Is disability studies actually white disability studies?" In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The Disability Studies Reader (3rd ed.) (pp. 374-382). New York, NY: Routledge.
  5. Bowleg, L. (2008). When black + lesbian + woman ≠ black lesbian woman: The methodological challenges of qualitative and quantitative intersectionality research. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 59(5/6), 301-311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9400-z · DOI · Paper page
  6. Chen, M. Y. (2014). Brain fog: The race for cripistemology. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 8(2), 171-184. https://doi.org/10.3828/jlcds.2014.14 · DOI
  7. Cohen, C. J. (2005). "Punks, bulldaggers and welfare queens: The radical potential of queer politics?" In E. P. Johnson & M. Henderson (Eds.) Black Queer Studies: A critical anthology (pp. 21-51). Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822387220-003 · DOI
  8. Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
  9. Combahee River Collective (1986). Combahee River Collective: Black feminist organizing in the seventies and eighties. Albany, NY: Women of Color Press.
  10. Cramer, E. P., & Plummer, S. B. (2009). People of color with disabilities: Intersectionality as a framework for analyzing intimate partner violence in social, historical, and political contexts. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 18(2), 161-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926770802675635 · DOI
  11. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(7), 1241-1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039 cripchick. (2007, December 14). Scary ransom notes campaign. [Web log]. Retrieved from https://misscripchick.wordpress.com/2007/12/14/scary-ransom-notes-campaign/ · DOI · Paper page
  12. Dekker, M. (1999, November). On our own terms: Emerging autistic culture. Presented at Autism 99 Online Conference. Retrieved from http://www.autscape.org/2015/programme/handouts/Autistic-Culture-07-Oct-1999.pdf
  13. Dill, B. T. (1983). Race, class, and gender: Prospects for an all-inclusive sisterhood. Feminist Studies, 9(1), 131-150. https://doi.org/10.2307/3177687 · DOI
  14. Erevelles N. (2011). Disability and difference in global contexts: Enabling a transformative body politic. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137001184 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Erevelles N. (2014). "Crippin' Jim Crow: Disability and the school-to-prison pipeline." In L. Ben-Moshe, Y. A. Davis, & C. Chapman (Eds.) Disability Incarcerated: Imprisonment and disability in the United States and Canada (pp. 81-99). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  16. Erevelles, N. & Minear, A. (2010). Unspeakable offenses: Untangling race and disability discourses of intersectionality. Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies, 4(2), 127-146. https://doi.org/10.3828/jlcds.2010.11 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Fernandes, F. (2003). A response to Erica Burman. European Journal of Psychotherapy, Counselling and Health, 6(3), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364253042000281351 · DOI
  18. Hancock, A. M. (2007). When multiplication doesn't equal quick addition: Examining intersectionality as a research paradigm. Perspectives on Politics, 5(1), 63-79. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592707070065 · DOI
  19. Hirschmann, N. J., (2013). Disability, feminism, and intersectionality: A critical approach. Radical Philosophy Review, 16(2), 649-662. https://doi.org/10.5840/radphilrev201316247 hooks, b. (1981). Ain't I a woman? Black women and feminism. Boston, MA: South End Press. hooks, b. (1984). Feminist theory: From margin to center. Boston, MA: South End Press. · DOI
  20. Hulko, W. (2009). The time- and context-contingent nature of intersectionailty and interlocking oppressions. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 24(1), 44-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109908326814 · DOI
  21. Jesudason, S. A. (2009). In the hot tub: The praxis of building new alliances in reprogenetics. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 34(4), 901-924. https://doi.org/10.1086/597129 · DOI
  22. King, D. K. (1988). Multiple jeopardy, multiple consciousness: The context of a black feminist ideology. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 14(1), 42-72. https://doi.org/10.1086/494491 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Kras, J. F. (2010). The 'ransom notes' affair: When the neurodiversity movement came of age. Disability Studies Quarterly, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v30i1.1065 · DOI
  24. Lorde, A. (1984). Sister outsider: Essays and speeches. Trumansburg, NY: Crossing Press.
  25. McRuer, R. (2006). Crip theory: Cultural signs of queerness and disability. New York, NY: New York University Press.
  26. Lukin, J. (2013). "Disability and blackness." In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The Disability Studies Reader (4th ed.) (pp. 308-315). New York, NY: Routledge.
  27. McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30(3), 1771–1800. https://doi.org/10.1086/426800 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Mohanty, C. T. (1988). Under western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Feminist Review, 30(1), 61-88. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.1988.42 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Mohanty, C. T. (2003). Feminism without borders: Decolonizing theory, practicing solidarity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822384649 · DOI
  30. Moore, L. F., Gray-Garcia, L. T., & Thrower, E. H. (2016). "Black & blue: Policing disability & poverty beyond occupy." In P. Block, D. Kasnitz, A. Nishida, & N. Pollard (Eds.) Occupying disability: Critical approaches to community, justice, and decolonizing disability (pp. 295-318). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9984-3_21 · DOI
  31. Nash, J. C. (2008). Re-thinking intersectionality. Feminist Review, 89, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2008.4 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Phoenix, A. (2006). Intersectionality. European Journal of Women's Studies, 13(3), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506806065751 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Price, M. (2011). Mad at school: Rhetorics of mental disability and academic life. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.1612837 · DOI
  34. Price, M. (2015). The bodymind problem and the possibilities of pain. Hypatia, 30(1), 268-284. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12127 · DOI
  35. Puar, J. K. (2009). Prognosis time: Towards a geopolitics of affect, debility and capacity. Women & Performance: a journal aof feminist theory, 19(2), 161-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/07407700903034147 · DOI
  36. Puar, J. K. (2015). Bodies with new organs: Becoming trans, becoming disabled. Social Text, 33(3), 45-73. https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-3125698 · DOI
  37. Purdie-Vaughns, V., & Eibach, R. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles, 59, 377-391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9424-4 · DOI
  38. Rakes, H. (2013). Toward a theo-practical accountability to difference and relationality. Disability Studies Quarterly, 33(4). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v33i4.3873 · DOI
  39. Reagan, B. J. (1983). Coalition politics: Turning the century. In B. Smith (Ed.) Home girls: A Black feminist anthology (pp. 343-355). New York, NY: Kitchen Table Women of Color Press.
  40. Risman, B. J. (2004). Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism. Gender & Society, 18, 429–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243204265349 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Roberts, D. & Jesudason, S. (2013). Movement intersectionality: The case of race, gender, disability, and genetic technologies. Du Bois Review, 10(2), 313-328. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742058X13000210 · DOI
  42. Robertson, S. M. (2010). Neurodiversity, quality of life, and autistic adults: Shifting research and professional focuses onto real-life challenges. Disability Studies Quarterly, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v30i1.1069 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Robertson, S. M. & Ne'eman, A. D. (2008). Autistic acceptance, the college campus, and technology: Growth of neurodiversity in society and academia. Disability Studies Quarterly, 28(4). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v28i4.146 · DOI
  44. Schalk, S. (2013). Coming to claim crip: Disidentification with/in Disability Studies. Disability Studies Quarterly, 33(2). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v33i2.3705 · DOI
  45. Seng, J. S., Lopez, W. D., Sperlich, M., Hamana, L., & Reed Meldrum, C. D. (2012). Marginalized identities, discrimination burden, and mental health: Empirical exploration of an interpersonal-level approach to modeling intersectionality. Social Science & Medicine, 75(12), 2437-2445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.09.023 · DOI
  46. Shaw, L. R., Chan, F., & McMahon, B. T. (2012). Intersectionality and disability harassment: The interactive effects of disability, race, age, and gender. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 55(2), 82-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034355211431167 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Sinclair, J. (2010). Cultural commentary: Being autistic together. Disability Studies Quarterly 30(1). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v30i1.1075 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Smooth, W. G. (2013). Intersectionality from theoretical framework to policy intervention. In A. R. Wilson (Ed.), Situating intersectionality: Politics, policy, and power (pp.11-42), New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137025135_2 · DOI
  49. Spivak, G. C. (1993). Outside in the teaching machine. New York, NY: Routledge.
  50. Staunces, D. (2003). Where have all the subjects gone? Bringing together the concepts of intersectionality and subjectification. Nora: Nordic Journal of Women's Studies, 2(11), 101-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740310002950 · DOI
  51. Steinbugler, A. C., Press, J. E., & Johnson Dias, J. (2006). Gender, race, and affirmative action: Operationalizing intersectionality in survey research. Gender & Society 20(6), 805-822. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243206293299 · DOI
  52. Warner, L. (2008). A best practices guide to intersectional approaches in psychological research. Sex Roles, 59, 454-463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9504-5 · DOI
  53. Young, I. M. (2004). Gender as seriality: Thinking about women as a social collective. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture & Society, 19(3), 193-209.
  54. For examples, see Lisa Bowleg (2007); Ange-Marie Hancock (2007); Julia S. Seng, William D. Lopez, Mickey Sperlich, Lydia Hamama, and Caroline D. Reed Meldrum (2012); Linda Shaw, Fong Chan, and Brian McMahon (2012); and Amy Steinbugler, Julie Press, and Janice Johnson Dias (2006). Return to Text
  55. Strand, L. (2017) 'Charting Relations between Intersectionality Theory and the Neurodiversity Paradigm', Disability Studies Quarterly. 37(2) doi: 10.18061/dsq.v37i2.5374
  56. Strand, L. Charting Relations between Intersectionality Theory and the Neurodiversity Paradigm. Disability Studies Quarterly. 2017 6; %}37(2) doi: 10.18061/dsq.v37i2.5374
  57. Strand, L. (2017, 6 1). Charting Relations between Intersectionality Theory and the Neurodiversity Paradigm. Disability Studies Quarterly 37(2) doi: 10.18061/dsq.v37i2.5374

Cited by

See all 55

Metadata

Authors
Strand, L. R.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Strand, Lauren Rose
ORCID
Strand, Lauren Rose
Venue
Disability Studies Quarterly
Publisher
The Ohio State University Libraries
Published
2017-06-01
Volume
37
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 1041-5718 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-8371
DOI
10.18061/dsq.v37i2.5374
OpenAlex
W2621248701
Cited by
55
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4
FWCI
5.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Disability Studies Quarterly (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Feminist Theory and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
Keywords
intersectionality theory, neurodiversity paradigm, Black Lives Matter, police brutality, coalition building, disability activism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Charting Relations between Intersectionality Theory and the Neurodiversity Paradigm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.18061/dsq.v37i2.5374
The paper
Strand, L. R. (2017). Charting Relations between Intersectionality Theory and the Neurodiversity Paradigm. Disability Studies Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v37i2.5374

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.