Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 258

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Circulating exosomal microRNAs as prognostic biomarkers for non-small-cell lung cancer

Open access
Liu, Qingyun, Yu, Zubin, Yuan, Shuai, Xie, Weijia, Li, Chengying, Hu, Zeyao, Xiang, Ying, Wu, Na, Wu, Long, Bai, Li, Li, Yafei·2017·Oncotarget

Abstract

// Qingyun Liu 1, * , Zubin Yu 2, * , Shuai Yuan 1, * , Weijia Xie 1 , Chengying Li 1 , Zeyao Hu 1 , Ying Xiang 1 , Na Wu 1 , Long Wu 1 , Li Bai 3, ** , Yafei Li 1, ** 1 Department of Epidemiology, College of Preventive Medicine, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, People’s Republic of China 2 Department of Thoracic Surgery, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, People’s Republic of China 3 Department of Respiratory Disease, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, People’s Republic of China * These authors have contributed equally to this work ** These authors jointly directed the project Correspondence to: Yafei Li, email: liyafei2008@hotmail.com Keywords: non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), exosome, miRNAs, prognosis, biomarker Received: June 29, 2016 Accepted: December 05, 2016 Published: December 30, 2016 ABSTRACT Exosomal miRNAs are proposed as excellent candidate biomarkers for clinical applications. However, little is known about their potential roles as prognostic biomarkers in lung cancer. In this study, we explored the prognostic value of plasma exosomal microRNAs (miRNAs) for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Using a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) array panel, we analyzed 84 plasma exosomal miRNAs in 10 lung adenocarcinoma patients and 10 matched healthy controls. The qPCR array showed 30 aberrantly expressed exosomal miRNAs. Nine candidate miRNAs were selected based on differential expression and previous reports for further evaluating their prognostic roles in 196 NSCLC patients. Elevated levels of exosomal miR-23b-3p, miR-10b-5p and miR-21-5p were independently associated with poor overall survival (with hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 2.42 (1.45 - 4.04), P = 0.001; 2.22 (1.18 - 4.16), P = 0.013; 2.12 (1.28 - 3.49), P = 0.003, respectively). When compared to the clinical prognostic variables only model, adding the three exosomal miRNA signatures significantly improved survival predictive accuracy with an increase of time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve from 0.88 to 0.91 (P=0.015). Our results indicated that plasma exosomal miR-23b-3p, miR-10b-5p and miR-21-5p are promising non-invasive prognostic biomarkers of NSCLC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18632/oncotarget.14369

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 65 references

Cited by

See all 258

Metadata

Authors
Liu, Q., Yu, Z., Yuan, S., Xie, W., Li, C., Hu, Z., Xiang, Y., Wu, N., Wu, L., Bai, L., & Li, Y.
Venue
Oncotarget
Published
2016-12-30
Volume
8
Issue
8
Pages
13048-13058
ISSN
1949-2553 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2564567999
Cited by
258
References
65
FWCI
10.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Circulating exosomal microRNAs as prognostic biomarkers for non-small-cell lung cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.18632/oncotarget.14369
The paper
Liu, Q., Yu, Z., Yuan, S., Xie, W., Li, C., Hu, Z., Xiang, Y., Wu, N., Wu, L., Bai, L., & Li, Y. (2017). Circulating exosomal microRNAs as prognostic biomarkers for non-small-cell lung cancer. Oncotarget. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.14369

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.