The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The LAMBADA dataset: Word prediction requiring a broad discourse context
Open accessAbstract
Denis Paperno, Germán Kruszewski, Angeliki Lazaridou, Ngoc Quan Pham, Raffaella Bernardi, Sandro Pezzelle, Marco Baroni, Gemma Boleda, Raquel Fernández. Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2016.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“There is no 'ground-truth' implementation from the original benchmark authors, and many popular benchmarks (Paperno et al., 2016; Clark et al., 2018; Zellers et al., 2019) that have been 'retrofitted' for compatibility with autoregressive LMs.”
From Lessons from the Trenches on Reproducible Evaluation of Language Models (2024) · cites this paper as Paperno et al., 2016
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“for evaluating the following tasks that measure common sense reasoning: LAMBADA (OpenAI version in LM Evaluation Harness) (Paperno et al., 2016), HellaSwag (Zellers et al., 2019), PIQA (Bisk et al., 2020), ARC-challenge, ARC-easy (Clark et al., 2018), WinoGrande (Sakaguchi et al., 2021).”
From xLSTM: Extended Long Short-Term Memory (2024) · cites this paper as Paperno et al., 2016
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In contrast to other simple benchmarks like LAMBADA [44] or GSM8K [45], which test skills not directly applicable to software engineering, the SWAA set represents actions that are needed in both software engineering work and the longer tasks we study.”
From Measuring AI Ability to Complete Long Software Tasks (2025) · cites this paper as [44]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“On the final word prediction dataset LAMBADA (Paperno et al., 2016), Chinchilla achieves 77.4% accuracy, compared to 74.5% accuracy from Gopher and 76.6% from MT-NLG 530B (see Table 7).”
From Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models (2022) · cites this paper as Paperno et al., 2016
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1301.3781 · Cited by 26,568
Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate
Bahdanau, D., Cho, K., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.0473 · Cited by 16,213
Elman, J. L. (1990) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1402_1 · Cited by 11,212
SRILM - an extensible language modeling toolkit
Stolcke, A. (2002) · International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP) · doi:10.21437/icslp.2002-303 · Cited by 4,385
Zhu, Y., Kiros, R., Zemel, R., Salakhutdinov, R., Urtasun, R., Torralba, A., & Fidler, S. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.11 · Cited by 2,264
Vinyals, O., & Le, Q. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1506.05869 · Cited by 1,400
A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencePreprint
Bowman, S. R., Angeli, G., Potts, C., & Manning, C. D. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1508.05326 · Cited by 1,020
A Neural Network Approach to Context-Sensitive Generation of Conversational Responses
Sordoni, A., Galley, M., Auli, M., Brockett, C., Ji, Y., Mitchell, M., Nie, J., Gao, J., & Dolan, B. (2015) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.3115/v1/n15-1020 · Cited by 782
MCTest: A Challenge Dataset for the Open-Domain Machine Comprehension of Text
Richardson, M., Burges, C., & Renshaw, E. (2013) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d13-1020 · Cited by 778
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Karl Moritz Hermann, Tomáš Kočiský, Edward Grefenstette, Lasse Espeholt, Will Kay, Mustafa Suleyman, and Phil Blunsom. 2015. Teaching machines to read and comprehend. In Proceed- ings of NIPS, Montreal, Canada. Published online: https://papers.nips.cc/book/ advances-in-neural-information- processing-systems-28-2015.
- Tomas Mikolov, Stefan Kombrink, Anoop Deoras, Lukar Burget, and Jan Honza Cernocky. 2011. Rnnlm -recurrent neural network language. In Pro- ceedings of ASRU. IEEE Automatic Speech Recog- nition and Understanding Workshop.
- Tomas Mikolov. 2014. Using neural net- works for modelling and representing nat- ural languages. Slides presented at COL- ING, online at http://www.coling- 2014.org/COLING\2014\Tutorial- fix\-\TomasMikolov.pdf.
- Tim Rocktäschel, Edward Grefenstette, Karl Moritz Hermann, Tomáš Kočiský, and Phil Blunsom. 2016. Reasoning about entailment with neural attention. In Proceedings of ICLR Conference Track, San Juan, Puerto Rico. Published online: http://www. iclr.cc/doku.php?id=iclr2016:main.
- Sainbayar Sukhbaatar, Arthur Szlam, Jason Weston, and Rob Fergus. 2015. End-to-end memory networks. http://arxiv.org/abs/1503. 08895.
- Oriol Vinyals and Quoc Le. 2015. A neural conver- sational model. In Proceedings of the ICML Deep Learning Workshop, Lille, France. Published on- line: https://sites.google.com/site/ deeplearning2015/accepted-papers.
- Tian Wang and Kyunghyun Cho. 2015. Larger- context language modelling. http://arxiv. org/abs/1511.03729.
- Wenpeng Yin and Hinrich Schütze. 2015. Multi- GranCNN: An architecture for general matching of text chunks on multiple levels of granularity. In Pro- ceedings of ACL, pages 63-73, Beijing, China.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372
On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models
Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., Bernstein, M. S., Bohg, J., Bosselut, A., Brunskill, E., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.07258 · Cited by 2,676
PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathways
Chowdhery, A., Narang, S., Devlin, J., Bosma, M., Mishra, G., Roberts, A., Barham, P., Chung, H. W., Sutton, C., Gehrmann, S., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.02311 · Cited by 2,590
“…TriviaQA (Joshi et al., 2017), Natural Questions (Kwiatkowski et al., 2019), Web Questions (Berant et al., 2013) • Cloze and Completion tasks: LAMBADA (Paperno et al., 2016), HellaSwag (Zellers et al., 2019), StoryCloze (Mostafazadeh et al., 2016) • Winograd-style tasks: Winograd (Levesque et…”
BackgroundMethodNatural Questions: A benchmark for question answering research
Kwiatkowski, T., Palomaki, J., Redfield, O., Collins, M., Parikh, A., Alberti, C., Epstein, D., Polosukhin, I., Devlin, J., Lee, K., et al. (2019) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00276 · Cited by 2,069
RoFormer: Enhanced transformer with rotary position embedding
Su, J., Ahmed, M., Lu, Y., Pan, S., Bo, W., & Liu, Y. (2024) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2023.127063 · Cited by 1,957
Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models
Chung, H. W., Hou, L., Longpre, S., Zoph, B., Tay, Y., Fedus, W., Li, Y., Wang, X., Dehghani, M., Brahma, S., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.11416 · Cited by 1,441
Adversarial Examples for Evaluating Reading Comprehension Systems
Jia, R., & Liang, P. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d17-1215 · Cited by 1,410
A Comprehensive Overview of Large Language Models
Naveed, H., Khan, A. U., Qiu, S., Saqib, M., Anwar, S., Usman, M., Akhtar, N., Barnes, N., & Mian, A. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3744746 · Cited by 1,257
Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spaces
Gu, A., & Dao, T. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.00752 · Cited by 1,579
Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understanding
Nie, Y., Williams, A., Dinan, E., Bansal, M., Weston, J., & Kiela, D. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.441 · Cited by 656
What BERT Is Not: Lessons from a New Suite of Psycholinguistic Diagnostics for Language Models
Ettinger, A. (2020) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00298 · Cited by 511
DROP: A Reading Comprehension Benchmark Requiring Discrete Reasoning Over Paragraphs
Dua, D., Wang, Y., Dasigi, P., Stanovsky, G., Singh, S., & Gardner, M. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1246 · Cited by 393
Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
Bai, Y., Jones, A., Ndousse, K., Askell, A., Chen, A., DasSarma, N., Drain, D., Fort, S., Ganguli, D., Henighan, T., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.05862 · Cited by 442
Gated-Attention Readers for Text Comprehension
Dhingra, B., Liu, H., Yang, Z., Cohen, W., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2017) · Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p17-1168 · Cited by 366
Targeted Syntactic Evaluation of Language Models
Marvin, R., & Linzen, T. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1151 · Cited by 334
Bai, J., Bai, S., Chu, Y., Cui, Z., Dang, K., Deng, X., Fan, Y., Ge, W., Han, Y., Huang, F., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.16609 · Cited by 332
Bisk, Y., Holtzman, A., Thomason, J., Andreas, J., Bengio, Y., Chai, J. Y., Lapata, M., Lazaridou, A., May, J., Nisnevich, A., et al. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.703 · Cited by 421
Self-citationxLSTM: Extended Long Short-Term Memory
Beck, M., Pöppel, K., Spanring, M., Auer, A., Prudnikova, O., Kopp, M., Klambauer, G., Brandstetter, J., & Hochreiter, S. (2024) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37 · doi:10.52202/079017-3417 · Cited by 286
A Survey on Model Compression for Large Language Models
Zhu, X., Li, J., Liu, Y., Ma, C., & Wang, W. (2024) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00704 · Cited by 273
AGIEval: A Human-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Foundation Models
Zhong, W., Cui, R., Guo, Y., Liang, Y., Lu, S., Wang, Y., Saied, A., Chen, W., & Duan, N. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.06364 · Cited by 211
“The LAMBADA language modeling task (Paperno et al., 2016) assesses language models’ ability to capture long-range dependencies in text.”
Foundation metrics for evaluating effectiveness of healthcare conversations powered by generative AI
Abbasian, M., Khatibi, E., Azimi, I., Oniani, D., Shakeri Hossein Abad, Z., Thieme, A., Sriram, R., Yang, Z., Wang, Y., Lin, B., et al. (2024) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-024-01074-z · Cited by 213
“…nature of healthcare applications, us-ing conversational models necessitates establishing a unified and comprehensive set of foundation metrics 1 that enable a meticulous evaluation of the models’ performance, capabilities, identification of potential errors, and implementation of e ff ective…”
BackgroundCompressive Transformers for Long-Range Sequence Modelling
Rae, J. W., Potapenko, A., Jayakumar, S. M., & Lillicrap, T. P. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.05507 · Cited by 205
Crowdsourcing Multiple Choice Science Questions
Welbl, J., Liu, N. F., & Gardner, M. (2017) · Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text (W-NUT) · doi:10.18653/v1/w17-4413 · Cited by 574
Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Models
Hoffmann, J., Borgeaud, S., Mensch, A., Buchatskaya, E., Cai, T., Rutherford, E., Casas, D. D. L., Hendricks, L. A., Welbl, J., Clark, A., et al. (2022) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 · doi:10.52202/068431-2176 · Cited by 932
“On LAMBADA (Paperno et al., 2016), Chinchilla outperforms both Gopher and MT-NLG 530B.”
InfluentialLanguage Models (Mostly) Know What They Know
Kadavath, S., Conerly, T., Askell, A., Henighan, T., Drain, D., Perez, E., Schiefer, N., Hatfield-Dodds, Z., DasSarma, N., Tran-Johnson, E., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2207.05221 · Cited by 187
QA Dataset Explosion: A Taxonomy of NLP Resources for Question Answering and Reading Comprehension
Rogers, A., Gardner, M., & Augenstein, I. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3560260 · Cited by 213
An Explanation of In-context Learning as Implicit Bayesian Inference
Xie, S. M., Raghunathan, A., Liang, P., & Ma, T. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.02080 · Cited by 138
Personality Traits in Large Language ModelsPreprint
Serapio‐García, G., Safdari, M., Crepy, C., Sun, L., Fitz, S., Abdulhai, M., Faust, A., & Matarić, M. J. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3296728/v1 · Cited by 137
Trick Me If You Can: Human-in-the-Loop Generation of Adversarial Examples for Question Answering
Wallace, E., Rodríguez, P., Feng, S., Yamada, I., & Boyd-Graber, J. L. (2019) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00279 · Cited by 139
Large-scale Cloze Test Dataset Created by Teachers
Xie, Q., Lai, G., Dai, Z., & Hovy, E. H. (2018) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1257 · Cited by 144
A Survey on Contextual EmbeddingsPreprint
Liu, Q., Kusner, M. J., & Blunsom, P. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.4230/oasics.slate.2021.12 · Cited by 243
An Information-theoretic Approach to Prompt Engineering Without Ground Truth Labels
Sorensen, T., Robinson, J., Rytting, C., Shaw, A., Rogers, K., Delorey, A., Khalil, M., Fulda, N., & Wingate, D. (2022) · Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.60 · Cited by 113
Challenges in Detoxifying Language Models
Welbl, J., Glaese, A., Uesato, J., Dathathri, S., Mellor, J., Hendricks, L. A., Anderson, K., Kohli, P., Coppin, B., & Huang, P.-S. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2021 · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-emnlp.210 · Cited by 112
Ordinal Common-sense Inference
Zhang, S., Rudinger, R., Duh, K., & Durme, B. V. (2017) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00068 · Cited by 116
What Makes Reading Comprehension Questions Easier?
Sugawara, S., Inui, K., Sekine, S., & Aizawa, A. (2018) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1453 · Cited by 111
A Survey on Machine Reading Comprehension—Tasks, Evaluation Metrics and Benchmark Datasets
Zeng, C., Li, S., Li, Q., Hu, J., & Hu, J. (2020) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app10217640 · Cited by 117
What Will it Take to Fix Benchmarking in Natural Language Understanding?
Bowman, S. R., & Dahl, G. E. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.385 · Cited by 211
xLSTM: Extended Long Short-Term Memory
Beck, M., Pöppel, K., Spanring, M., Auer, A., Prudnikova, O., Kopp, M., Klambauer, G., Brandstetter, J., & Hochreiter, S. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.04517 · Cited by 299
Mind the Gap: Assessing Temporal Generalization in Neural Language Models
Lazaridou, A., Kuncoro, A., Gribovskaya, E., Agrawal, D., Liska, A., Terzi, T., Gimenez, M., d'Autume, C. D. M., Kocisky, T., Ruder, S., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.01951 · Cited by 90
Self-citationAdversarially Regularising Neural
Minervini, P., & Riedel, S. (2018) · Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning · doi:10.18653/v1/k18-1007 · Cited by 85
Understanding the Potential of FPGA-based Spatial Acceleration for Large Language Model Inference
Chen, H., Zhang, J., Du, Y., Xiang, S., Yue, Z., Zhang, N., Cai, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems · doi:10.1145/3656177 · Cited by 98
Understanding Emergent Abilities of Language Models from the Loss Perspective
Du, Z., Zeng, A., Dong, Y., & Tang, J. (2024) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37 · doi:10.52202/079017-1683 · Cited by 76
SituatedQA: Incorporating Extra-Linguistic Contexts into QA
Zhang, M. J. Q., & Choi, E. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.586 · Cited by 108
ChID: A Large-scale Chinese IDiom Dataset for Cloze Test
Zheng, C., Huang, M., & Sun, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1075 · Cited by 82
MEMEN: Multi-layer Embedding with Memory Networks for Machine ComprehensionPreprint
Pan, B., Li, H., Zhao, Z., Cao, B., Cai, D., & He, X. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.09098 · Cited by 58
Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinks
Xiao, G., Tian, Y., Chen, B., Han, S., & Lewis, M. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.17453 · Cited by 55
Embracing data abundance: BookTest Dataset for Reading ComprehensionPreprint
Bajgar, O., Kadlec, R., & Kleindienst, J. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1610.00956 · Cited by 52
Deep learning based question answering system in Bengali
Mayeesha, T. T., Sarwar, A. M., & Rahman, R. M. (2020) · Journal of Information and Telecommunication · doi:10.1080/24751839.2020.1833136 · Cited by 54
Which *BERT? A Survey Organizing Contextualized Encoders
Xia, P., Wu, S., & Durme, B. V. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.608 · Cited by 57
The case for 4-bit precision: k-bit Inference Scaling Laws
Dettmers, T., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.09720 · Cited by 46
Machine Reading Comprehension: The Role of Contextualized Language Models and BeyondPreprint
Zhang, Z., Zhao, H., & Wang, R. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.06249 · Cited by 63
Adversarially Regularising Neural NLI Models to Integrate Logical Background KnowledgePreprint
Minervini, P., & Riedel, S. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1808.08609 · Cited by 50
Welbl, J., Stenetorp, P., & Riedel, S. (2018) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00021 · Cited by 474
English Machine Reading Comprehension Datasets: A Survey
Dzendzik, D., Foster, J., & Vogel, C. M. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.693 · Cited by 47
ProcessTransformer: Predictive Business Process Monitoring with Transformer NetworkPreprint
Bukhsh, Z. A., Saeed, A., & Dijkman, R. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.00721 · Cited by 107
All NLP Tasks Are Generation Tasks: A General Pretraining FrameworkPreprint
Du, Z., Qian, Y., Liu, X., Ding, M., Qiu, J., Yang, Z., & Tang, J. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 38
Evaluation Metrics for Machine Reading Comprehension: Prerequisite Skills and Readability
Sugawara, S., Kido, Y., Yokono, H., & Aizawa, A. (2017) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p17-1075 · Cited by 35
Attending to Entities for Better Text Understanding
Cheng, P., & Erk, K. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i05.6254 · Cited by 41
What Language Model to Train if You Have One Million GPU Hours?
Le Scao, T., Wang, T., Hesslow, D., Bekman, S., Bari, M. S., Biderman, S., Elsahar, H., Muennighoff, N., Phang, J., Press, O., et al. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2022 · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.54 · Cited by 33
Digital forgetting in large language models: a survey of unlearning methods
Blanco-Justicia, A., Jebreel, N., Manzanares-Salor, B., Sánchez, D., Domingo-Ferrer, J., Collell, G., & Eeik Tan, K. (2025) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-024-11078-6 · Cited by 31
“Eldan and Russinovich (2023), Wang et al (2023), and Jang et al (2022) leverage well-established LLM benchmarks, such as those used for comparing LLMs (Sakaguchi et al 2020; Zellers et al 2019; Paperno et al 2016; Bisk et al 2020).”
A psychometric framework for evaluating and shaping personality traits in large language models
Serapio-García, G., Safdari, M., Crepy, C., Sun, L., Fitz, S., Romero, P., Abdulhai, M., Faust, A., & Matarić, M. (2025) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-025-01115-6 · Cited by 30
Inverse Scaling: When Bigger Isn't Better
McKenzie, I. R., Lyzhov, A., Pieler, M., Parrish, A., Mueller, A., Prabhu, A., McLean, E., Kirtland, A., Ross, A., Liu, A., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.09479 · Cited by 29
Linguistic Knowledge as Memory for Recurrent Neural NetworksPreprint
Dhingra, B., Yang, Z., Cohen, W. W., & Salakhutdinov, R. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.02620 · Cited by 34
MiniF2F: a cross-system benchmark for formal Olympiad-level mathematics
Zheng, K., Han, J. M., & Polu, S. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.00110 · Cited by 26
“Shared benchmarks and datasets have historically played a crucial role in driving advances in large-scale applications of deep learning, e.g. in computer vision (Deng et al., 2009) and natural language processing (Wang et al., 2019; Rajpurkar et al., 2016; Paperno et al., 2016).”
BackgroundDo Transformers Need Deep Long-Range Memory?
Rae, J. W., & Razavi, A. S. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.672 · Cited by 27
Don't Make Your LLM an Evaluation Benchmark Cheater
Zhou, K., Zhu, Y., Chen, Z., Chen, W., Zhao, W. X., Chen, X., Lin, Y., Wen, J.-R., & Han, J. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.01964 · Cited by 25
Kaushik, D., Kiela, D., Lipton, Z. C., & Yih, W.-T. (2021) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.517 · Cited by 30
Broad Context Language Modeling as Reading Comprehension
Chu, Z., Wang, H., Gimpel, K., & McAllester, D. (2017) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/e17-2009 · Cited by 21
Titans: Learning to Memorize at Test Time
Behrouz, A., Zhong, P., & Mirrokni, V. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.00663 · Cited by 24
“Following recent studies on linear recurrent models [35, 30, 38], we use Wikitext [123], LMB [124], PIQA [125], HellaSwag [126], WinoGrande [127], ARC-easy (ARC-e) and ARC-challenge (ARC-c) [128], SIQA [129], and BoolQ [130].”
Benchmarking Machine Reading Comprehension: A Psychological Perspective
Sugawara, S., Stenetorp, P., & Aizawa, A. (2021) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.137 · Cited by 22
RWKV: Reinventing RNNs for the Transformer Era
Peng, B., Alcaide, E., Anthony, Q., Albalak, A., Arcadinho, S., Biderman, S., Cao, H., Cheng, X., Chung, M., Grella, M., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.13048 · Cited by 17
“Tasks: • LAMBADA (Paperno et al., 2016).”
Sugawara, S., Yokono, H., & Aizawa, A. (2017) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v31i1.10957 · Cited by 17
Chess as a Testbed for Language Model State Tracking
Toshniwal, S., Wiseman, S., Livescu, K., & Gimpel, K. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v36i10.21390 · Cited by 42
Mitigating harm in language models with conditional-likelihood filtrationPreprint
Ngo, H., Raterink, C., Araújo, J. G. M., Zhang, I., Chen, C., Morisot, A., & Frosst, N. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.07790 · Cited by 60
Mori, Y., Yamane, H., Ushiku, Y., & Harada, T. (2019) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2019.03.006 · Cited by 18
Understanding and Controlling Memory in Recurrent Neural NetworksPreprint
Haviv, D., Rivkind, A., & Barak, O. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.07275 · Cited by 19
Liu, N. F., Lee, T., Jia, R., & Liang, P. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 17
Rationales for Sequential Predictions
Vafa, K., Deng, Y., Blei, D., & Rush, A. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.807 · Cited by 14
Measuring AI Ability to Complete Long Software Tasks
Kwa, T., West, B., Becker, J., Deng, A., Garcia, K., Hasin, M., Jawhar, S., Kinniment, M., Rush, N., Von Arx, S., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.14499 · Cited by 14
The Non-native Speaker Aspect: Indian English in Social Media
Sarkar, R., Mahinder, S., & KhudaBukhsh, A. R. (2020) · Workshop on Noisy User-generated Text (W-NUT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.wnut-1.9 · Cited by 14
Entity Tracking Improves Cloze-style Reading Comprehension
Hoang, L., Wiseman, S., & Rush, A. M. (2018) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1130 · Cited by 12
A Gated Dilated Convolution with Attention Model for Clinical Cloze-Style Reading Comprehension
Wang, B., Zhang, X., Zhou, X., & Li, J. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17041323 · Cited by 12
Validating Large Language Models with ReLM
Kuchnik, M., Smith, V., & Amvrosiadis, G. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.15458 · Cited by 12
Hardware Accelerator for Approximation-Based Softmax and Layer Normalization in Transformers
Kim, R., Lee, D., Kim, J., Park, J., & Lee, S. E. (2025) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics14122337 · Cited by 10
Emergent Predication Structure in Hidden State Vectors of Neural Readers
Wang, H., Onishi, T., Gimpel, K., & McAllester, D. (2017) · Workshop on Representation Learning for NLP (RepL4NLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/w17-2604 · Cited by 10
Revisiting Simple Neural Probabilistic Language Models
Sun, S., & Iyyer, M. (2021) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.407 · Cited by 9
Gong, Z., Liu, J., Wang, J., Cai, X., Zhao, D., & Yan, R. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i16.29765 · Cited by 16
Residual Shuffle-Exchange Networks for Fast Processing of Long Sequences
Draguns, A., Ozoliņš, E., Šostaks, A., Apinis, M., & Freivalds, K. (2021) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i8.16890 · Cited by 8
Probing Pre-Trained Language Models for Disease Knowledge
Alghanmi, I., Espinosa-Anke, L., & Schockaert, S. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.266 · Cited by 8
Learning Associative Inference Using Fast Weight MemoryPreprint
Schlag, I., Munkhdalai, T., & Schmidhuber, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.07831 · Cited by 28
Measuring text readability with machine comprehension: a pilot study
Benzahra, M., & Yvon, F. (2019) · Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-4443 · Cited by 7
Lessons from the Trenches on Reproducible Evaluation of Language Models
Biderman, S., Schoelkopf, H., Sutawika, L., Gao, L., Tow, J., Abbasi, B., Aji, A. F., Ammanamanchi, P. S., Black, S., Clive, J., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.14782 · Cited by 9
“There is no “ground-truth” implementation from the original benchmark authors, and many popular benchmarks (Paperno et al., 2016; Clark et al., 2018; Zellers et al., 2019) that have been “retrofitted” for compatibility with autoregressive LMs.”
Limitations in learning an interpreted language with recurrent models
Paperno, D. (2018) · BlackboxNLP Workshop on Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP (BlackboxNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5456 · Cited by 5
Self-citationSome of Them Can be Guessed! Exploring the Effect of Linguistic Context in Predicting Quantifiers
Pezzelle, S., Steinert‐Threlkeld, S., Bernardi, R., & Szymanik, J. (2018) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-2019 · Cited by 7
Self-citationSCDE: Sentence Cloze Dataset with High Quality Distractors From Examinations
Kong, X., Gangal, V., & Hovy, E. H. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.502 · Cited by 7
On-The-Fly Information Retrieval Augmentation for Language Models
Wang, H., & McAllester, D. (2020) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.nuse-1.14 · Cited by 4
Emergent Logical Structure in Vector Representations of Neural Readers.Preprint
Wang, H., Onishi, T., Gimpel, K., & McAllester, D. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 4
Multi-Perspective Context Aggregation for Semi-supervised Cloze-style Reading ComprehensionPreprint
Wang, L., Li, S., Zhao, W., Shen, K., Sun, M., Jia, R., & Liu, J. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1808.06289 · Cited by 4
Hou, J. (2024) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/d3nc6 · Cited by 30
IRepair: An Intent-Aware Approach to Repair Data-Driven Errors in Large Language Models
Imtiaz, S. M., Singh, A., Batole, F., & Rajan, H. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on software engineering. · doi:10.1145/3715775 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Paperno, D., Kruszewski, G., Lazaridou, A., Pham, N. Q., Bernardi, R., Pezzelle, S., Baroni, M., Boleda, G., & Fernandez, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Trento (IT)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
- Published
- 2016
- Pages
- 1525-1534
- ISSN
- 0736-587X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2473344385
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 5.93
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Nvidia
- European Commission (655577, 283554, HORIZON2020)
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (276-89-008)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Keywords
- word prediction, discourse context, language models, discourse coherence, next sentence prediction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
