Cited by 35Physical Activity and HealthDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

A Racial Comparison of Differences between Self-Reported and Objectively Measured Physical Activity among US Adults with Diabetes

Open access
Bazargan-Hejazi, Shahrzad, Arroyo, Jeffrey S., Hsia, Stanley, Brojeni, Neda Rouhi, Pan, Deyu·2017·Ethnicity & Disease

Abstract

Objective: To investigate: 1) the racial/ethnic disparities in meeting the recommended physical activity as measured by subjective vs objective measures in a national sample of individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus; and 2) the racial/ethnic differences with respect to the magnitude of the discrepancy between self-reported and objectively measured moderate-to-vigorous intensity aerobic physical activity (MVPA). Methods: We used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003-06 to calculate and compare the percentage of individuals with diabetes who achieved the recommended levels of physical activity as measured by subjective self-report (500 metabolic equivalents (MET)-minutes/week) and objective accelerometer measurement (150 minutes per week of MVPA) across racial/ ethnic groups. Results: 71.2%, 15.7%, and 13.1% of participants were White, African American, and Hispanic, respectively. Based on self-report, 67.1%, 39.2%, and 55.1% of Whites, African Americans, and Hispanics, respectively, met the 500 MET-minutes/week threshold of physical activity (P<.0001). Objective measurement by accelerometer showed that 44.2%, 42.6%, and 65.1% of Whites, African Americans, and Hispanics, respectively, met the threshold (P<.0003). Conclusions: Many individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus did not meet the recommended physical activity thresholds. African Americans had the lowest proportion of meeting both the self-reported and objectively measured thresholds. White patients with diabetes overestimated frequency of their physical activity, while their Hispanic counterparts significantly underestimated it. Also, the gap between the two measures of MVPA was largest among Hispanics. Ethn Dis. 2017;27(4):403-410; doi:10.18865/ ed.27.4.403.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18865/ed.27.4.403

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Accelerometry data in 871 T2D patients showed that 55.8%, 57.4%, and 34.9% of White, African American, and Hispanic individuals did not meet the recommended threshold in guidelines.

    “accelerometry data in 871 T2D patients showed that 55.8%, 57.4%, and 34.9% of White, African American, and Hispanic individuals did not meet the recommended threshold in guidelines24.”
  • Objective measurement by accelerometer in 871 individuals with type 2 diabetes showed that 44.2%, 42.6%, and 65.1% of White, African American, and Hispanic individuals, respectively, met the recommended threshold of exercise.

    “Objective measurement by accelerometer in 871 individuals with type 2 diabetes showed that 44.2%, 42.6%, and 65.1% of White, African American, and Hispanic individuals, respectively, met the recommended threshold of exercise ( 241).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [15]15. Freene N, Waddington G, Chesworth W, Davey R, Cochrane T Validating two selfreport physical activity measures in middleaged adults completing a group exercise or home-based physical activity program. J Sci Med in Sport / Sports Medicine Australia. 2014;17:611-6. [DOI] [PubMed]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bazargan-Hejazi, S., Arroyo, J. S., Hsia, S., Brojeni, N. R., & Pan, D.
Affiliations
  • Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science (US)
  • St. Vincent Charity Hospital (US)
Venue
Ethnicity & Disease
Published
2017-12-07
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
403
ISSN
  • 1049-510X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-0826
OpenAlex
W2773967223
Cited by
35
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ethnicity & Disease (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000124)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (S21MD000103, U54MD007598)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, physical activity, self-reported physical activity, accelerometer-measured activity, racial and ethnic disparities, African Americans, Hispanic Americans, White Americans, physical activity guidelines
MeSH terms
Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Male, Morbidity, Nutrition Surveys, United States, Exercise, Racial Groups, Self Report, Accelerometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review