The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The use and misuse of biomarkers in ecotoxicology
Abstract
Substantial efforts have been devoted to developing and applying biomarkers for use in ecotoxicology. These efforts have resulted partly from a desire for early warning indicators that respond before measurable effects on individuals and populations occur and partly as an aid to identifying the causes of observed population- and community-level effects. Whereas older biomarkers focused on measures of organism physiology or biochemistry, advances in molecular biology are extending the biomarker philosophy to the level of the genes (i.e., ecotoxicogenomics). However, the extent to which biomarkers are able to provide unambiguous and ecologically relevant indicators of exposure to or effects of toxicants remains highly controversial. In the present paper, we briefly discuss the application of biomarkers in ecotoxicology and ecological risk assessment, and we provide examples of how they have been applied. We conclude that although biomarkers can be helpful for gaining insight regarding the mechanisms causing observed effects of chemicals on whole-organism performance and may, in some cases, provide useful indicators of exposure, individual biomarker responses should not be expected to provide useful predictions of relevant ecological effects—and probably not even predictions of whole-organism effects. Suites of biomarkers are only likely to provide increased predictability if they can be used in a comprehensive mechanistic model that integrates them into a measure of fitness. Until this can be achieved, biomarkers may be useful for hypothesis generation in carefully controlled experiments. However, because the aims of environmental monitoring and ecological risk assessment are to detect and/or predict adverse chemical impacts on populations, communities, and ecosystems, we should be focusing our efforts on improving methods to do this directly. This will involve developing and testing models of appropriate complexity that can describe real-world systems at multiple scales.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Caswell, H. (2014) · Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online · doi:10.1002/9781118445112.stat07481 · Cited by 2,448
Rondon, M. R., August, P. R., Bettermann, A. D., Brady, S. F., Grossman, T. H., Liles, M. R., Loiacono, K. A., Lynch, B. A., MacNeil, I. A., Minor, C., et al. (2000) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.66.6.2541-2547.2000 · Cited by 1,241
Biomarkers of Environmental Contamination
McCarthy, J. F., & Shugart, L. R. (2018) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781351070263 · Cited by 921
Fundamentals of Aquatic Toxicology: Effects, Environmental Fate, and Risk Assessment
(2020) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781003075363 · Cited by 907
Biomarkers: Biochemical, Physiological, and Histological Markers of Anthropogenic Stress
Huggett, R. J. (1992) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 789
Biomarkers: Biochemical, physiological, and histological markers of anthropogenic stress
Cooper, E. L. (1993) · Annual Review of Fish Diseases · doi:10.1016/0959-8030(93)90043-b · Cited by 760
Critical appraisal of the evidence for tributyltin-mediated endocrine disruption in mollusks
Matthiessen, P., & Gibbs, P. E. (1998) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.5620170106 · Cited by 613
Calabrese, E. J. (2005) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2004.10.001 · Cited by 543
Animal biomarkers as pollution indicators
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-1502 · Cited by 422
Nondestructive Biomarkers in Vertebrates
Fossi, C., & Leonzio, C. (2020) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780367813703 · Cited by 369
Cited by
Ecotoxicological applications and significance of the comet assay
Jha, A. N. (2008) · Mutagenesis · doi:10.1093/mutage/gen014 · Cited by 477
The role of biomarkers in the assessment of aquatic ecosystem health
Hook, S. E., Gallagher, E. P., & Batley, G. E. (2014) · Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management · doi:10.1002/ieam.1530 · Cited by 346
Connon, R. E., Geist, J., & Werner, I. (2012) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s120912741 · Cited by 300
Assessing the Impact of Multiple Stressors on Aquatic Biota: The Receptor’s Side Matters
Segner, H., Schmitt-Jansen, M., & Sabater, S. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es405082t · Cited by 189
Metadata
- Authors
- Forbes, V. E., Palmqvist, A., & Bach, L.
- Venue
- Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-01-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 272-280
- ISSN
- 0730-7268 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8618
- OpenAlex
- W1990700067
- Cited by
- 458
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 16.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The use and misuse of biomarkers in ecotoxicology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1897/05-257r.1
- The paper
- Forbes, V. E., Palmqvist, A., & Bach, L. (2006). The use and misuse of biomarkers in ecotoxicology. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1897/05-257r.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.