Cited by 64Behavioral and Psychological StudiesHuman Resource Development and Performance EvaluationChild Welfare and Adoption

THE TRAINING AND VALIDATION OF YOUTH‐PREFERRED SOCIAL BEHAVIORS OF CHILD‐CARE PERSONNEL1

Open access
Willner, Alan G., Braukmann, Curtis J., Kirigin, Kathryn A., Fixsen, Dean L., Phillips, Elery L., Wolf, Montrose M.·1977·Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis

Abstract

This research sought to identify, train, and validate social behaviors preferred by youths to be used by youth‐care personnel (called teaching‐parents). With training, consistent increases in seven preferred behaviors were observed for the six teaching‐parent trainees. These behaviors included offering to help, “getting to the point”, giving reasons why a behavior is important to a youth, providing descriptions of alternative behaviors, positive feedback, smiling, and positive motivational incentives (i.e., points for task mastery exchanged for tangible reinforcers). Increases in these behaviors correlated with increases in the youths' ratings of the quality of the trainees' interactions. Posttraining levels of preferred social behavior and youth ratings for trainees also compared favorably with levels for successful professional teaching‐parents. These results suggest that teaching‐parents can be successfully trained to interact with youths in ways that are preferred by the youths.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-219

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. [1]1. Ford, D., Ford, M. E., Christophersen, E. R., Fix- sen, D. L., Phillips E. L., and Wolf, M. M. An analysis of the efects of teaching-skills in a token economy for pre-delinquent youths. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Kansas, 1973.
  2. [3]3. Ayala, H. E., Minkin, N., Phillips, E. L., Fixsen, D. L., and Wolf, M. M. Achievement Place: the train- ing and analysis of vocational behaviors. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, (in press).
  3. [8]8. Braukmann, C. J., Fixsen, D. L., Kirigin, K. A., Phillips, E. A., Phillips, E. L., and Wolf, M. M. Achievement Place: The training and certification of teaching-parents. In W. S. Wood (Ed), Issues in evaluating behavior modification. Champaign, Illinois: Research Press, 1975. Pp. 131-152.
  4. [12]12. Federal Register. HEW guidelines on protection of human subjects, Vol. 38, No. 221, Part II, 1973.
  5. [14]14. Glaser, E. M. and Backer, T. E. A clinical approach to program evaluation. Evaluation, 1972, 1, 54- 60.
  6. [17]17. Hirshi, T. Causes of delinquency. Richmond: Uni- versity of California Press, 1969.
  7. [21]21. Maloney, D. M., Harper, T. M., Braukmann, C. J., Fixsen, D. L., Phillips, E. L., and Wolf, M. M. Effects of training predelinquent girls on conver- sation and posture behaviors by teaching-parents and juvenile peers. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1976, 9, 371.
  8. [23]23. Minkin, N., Braukmann, C. J., Minkin, B. L., Timbers, G. D., Timbers, B. J., Fixsen, D. L., Phillips, E. L., and Wolf, M. M. The social validation and training of conversation skills. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1976, 9, 127-139.
  9. [24]24. Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., and Tannenbaum, P. H. The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1957.
  10. [25]25. Phillips, E. L. Achievement Place: token reinforce- ment procedures in a home-style rehabilitation setting for "pre-delinquent" boys. Journal of Ap- plied Behavior Analysis, 1968, 1, 213-223.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Willner, A. G., Braukmann, C. J., Kirigin, K. A., Fixsen, D. L., Phillips, E. L., & Wolf, M. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Kansas (US)
  • Boys Town (US)
Corresponding author
Willner, Alan G.
Venue
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1977-06
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
219-230
ISSN
  • 0021-8855 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-3703
OpenAlex
W2080677426
Cited by
64
References
19
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
Keywords
youth preferences, positive reinforcement, motivational incentives, positive feedback, helping behavior, interaction quality, training validation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review