The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS AND EXTINCTION OF SELF‐INJURIOUS ESCAPE BEHAVIOR
Open accessAbstract
Three studies are presented in which environmental correlates of self‐injurious behavior were systematically examined and later used as the basis for treatment. In Study 1, 7 developmentally disabled subjects were exposed to a series of conditions designed to identify factors that maintain self‐injurious behavior: attention contingent on self‐injurious behavior (positive reinforcement), escape from or avoidance of demands contingent on self‐injurious behavior (negative reinforcement), alone (automatic reinforcement), and play (control). Results of a multielement design showed that each subject's self‐injurious behavior occurred more frequently in the demand condition, suggesting that the behavior served an avoidance or escape function. Six of the 7 subjects participated in Study 2. During educational sessions, “escape extinction” was applied as treatment for their self‐injurious behavior in a multiple baseline across subjects design. Results showed noticeable reduction or elimination of self‐injurious behavior for each subject and an increase in compliance with instructions in all subjects for whom compliance data were taken. The 7th subject, whose self‐injurious behavior during Study 1 occurred in response to medical demands (i.e., physical examinations), participated in Study 3. Treatment was comprised of extinction, as in Study 2, plus reinforcement for tolerance of the examination procedure, and was evaluated in a multiple baseline across settings design. Results showed that the treatment was successful in eliminating self‐injurious behavior and that its effects transferred across eight new therapists and three physicians. General implications for the design, interpretation, and uses of assessment studies are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SOME CURRENT DIMENSIONS OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS1
Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1968.1-91 · Cited by 3,935
Turner, R. M. (1978) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/0005-7916(78)90073-3 · Cited by 2,265
REDUCING BEHAVIOR PROBLEMS THROUGH FUNCTIONAL COMMUNICATION TRAINING
Carr, E. G., & Durand, V. M. (1985) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1985.18-111 · Cited by 2,154
Tactics of Scientific Research
Sidman, M. (1960) · Cited by 1,638
Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis
Eysenck, H. J. (1970) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(70)80039-9 · Cited by 1,358
Toward a functional analysis of self-injury
Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1982) · Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/0270-4684(82)90003-9 · Cited by 1,091
Self-citationDISTINGUISHING BETWEEN DISCRIMINATIVE AND MOTIVATIONAL FUNCTIONS OF STIMULI
Michael, J. (1982) · Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior · doi:10.1901/jeab.1982.37-149 · Cited by 963
The motivation of self-injurious behavior: A review of some hypotheses.
Carr, E. G. (1977) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.84.4.800 · Cited by 841
Identifying the variables maintaining self-injurious behavior
Mark Durand, V., & Crimmins, D. B. (1988) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/bf02211821 · Cited by 650
ASSESSMENT OF STIMULUS PREFERENCE AND REINFORCER VALUE WITH PROFOUNDLY RETARDED INDIVIDUALS
Pace, G. M., Ivancic, M. T., Edwards, G. L., Iwata, B. A., & Page, T. J. (1985) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1985.18-249 · Cited by 631
Self-citation
Cited by
FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF PROBLEM BEHAVIOR: A REVIEW
Hanley, G. P., Iwata, B. A., & McCord, B. E. (2003) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.2003.36-147 · Cited by 1,317
Self-citationMcClintock, K., Hall, S., & Oliver, C. (2003) · Journal of Intellectual Disability Research · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2788.2003.00517.x · Cited by 675
WHAT MAKES EXTINCTION WORK: AN ANALYSIS OF PROCEDURAL FORM AND FUNCTION
Iwata, B. A., Pace, G. M., Cowdery, G. E., & Miltenberger, R. G. (1994) · Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis · doi:10.1901/jaba.1994.27-131 · Cited by 338
Self-citationDifferential reinforcement as treatment for behavior disorders: Procedural and functional variations
Vollmer, T. R., & Iwata, B. A. (1992) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/0891-4222(92)90013-v · Cited by 198
Self-citationThe form and function of challenging behaviours
Emerson, E., & Bromley, J. (1995) · Journal of Intellectual Disability Research · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.1995.tb00543.x · Cited by 190
Metadata
- Authors
- Iwata, B. A., Pace, G. M., Kalsher, M. J., Cowdery, G. E., & Cataldo, M. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-03
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-27
- ISSN
- 0021-8855 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-3703
- OpenAlex
- W2139887804
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 21.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS AND EXTINCTION OF SELF‐INJURIOUS ESCAPE BEHAVIOR. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1901/jaba.1990.23-11
- The paper
- Iwata, B. A., Pace, G. M., Kalsher, M. J., Cowdery, G. E., & Cataldo, M. F. (1990). EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS AND EXTINCTION OF SELF‐INJURIOUS ESCAPE BEHAVIOR. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1990.23-11
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.