Cited by 995Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchCritical Race Theory in EducationRace, Genetics, and Society

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Critical Race Theory, Race Equity, and Public Health: Toward Antiracism Praxis

Open access
Ford, Chandra L., Airhihenbuwa, Collins O.·2010·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Racial scholars argue that racism produces rates of morbidity, mortality, and overall well-being that vary depending on socially assigned race. Eliminating racism is therefore central to achieving health equity, but this requires new paradigms that are responsive to structural racism's contemporary influence on health, health inequities, and research. Critical Race Theory is an emerging transdisciplinary, race-equity methodology that originated in legal studies and is grounded in social justice. Critical Race Theory's tools for conducting research and practice are intended to elucidate contemporary racial phenomena, expand the vocabulary with which to discuss complex racial concepts, and challenge racial hierarchies. We introduce Critical Race Theory to the public health community, highlight key Critical Race Theory characteristics (race consciousness, emphases on contemporary societal dynamics and socially marginalized groups, and praxis between research and practice) and describe Critical Race Theory's contribution to a study on racism and HIV testing among African Americans.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2009.171058

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Harawa NT, 2009, Ethn Dis, 19, 209
  2. West C, 1993, Keeping Faith: Philosophy and Race in America
  3. Gilmore RW, 2007, Golden Gulag: Prisons, Surplus, Crisis, and Opposition in Globalizing California
  4. Valdes F, 2002, Crossroads, Directions, and a New Critical Race Theory
  5. Delgado R, 2001, Critical Race Theory: An Introduction
  6. Bonilla-Silva E, 2006, Racism Without Racists: Colorblind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in the United States
  7. Bobo LD. Inequalities that endure? Racial ideology, American politics, and the peculiar role of the social sciences. In: Krysan M, Lewis AE, eds. The Changing Terrain of Race and Ethnicity . New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation; 2004:13–42.
  8. Williams DR, 1996, Ethn Dis, 6, 1
  9. Byrd WM, 2002, An American Health Dilemma: Race, Medicine, and Health Care in the United States, 2
  10. 10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00197-5 · DOI
  11. 10.2190/DBY6-VDQ8-HME8-ME3R · DOI
  12. 10.1136/bmj.316.7149.1970 · DOI
  13. La Veist TA, 1996, Ethn Dis, 6, 21
  14. 10.1016/S0277-9536(97)00035-X · DOI
  15. 10.2307/2657316 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.2307/4149999 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.05.010 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/s10464-007-9117-0 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.annepidem.2006.09.006 · DOI
  20. Schulz AJ, 2006, Gender, Race, Class, and Health: Intersectional Approaches
  21. Jones CP, 2008, Ethn Dis, 18, 496
  22. Muntaner C, Nagoshi C, Diala C. Racial ideology and explanations for health inequalities among middle-class whites. In: Krieger N, ed. Embodying Inequality: Epidemiologic Perspectives . Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing Company Inc; 2005:183–191.
  23. 10.2105/AJPH.90.8.1212 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.2190/Y3GE-NQCK-0LNR-T126 · DOI
  25. 10.1177/1090198106287731 · DOI
  26. 10.2105/AJPH.2007.120865 · DOI
  27. Branson BM, 2006, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 55, 1
  28. 10.1046/j.0022-4537.2003.00090.x · DOI
  29. 10.1353/hpu.2006.0017 · DOI
  30. 10.1136/jech.2005.035964 · DOI
  31. 10.1002/9781118150634 · DOI
  32. 10.1177/1090198106291377 · DOI
  33. 10.1093/aje/kwm004 · DOI
  34. 10.1177/0095798404266048 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–700 of 729

Metadata

Authors
Ford, C. L., & Airhihenbuwa, C. O.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2010-04
Volume
100
Issue
S1
Pages
S30-S35
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W1965164285
Cited by
995
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 91 · 2024: 107 · 2023: 126 · 2022: 160 · 2021: 150 · 2020: 81 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 9
FWCI
34.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • University Libraries (University of Maryland) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Repository at the University of Maryland (University of Maryland College Park)
Funders
  • W.K. Kellogg Foundation
  • Center for AIDS Research, University of Washington
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities
  • UCLA AIDS Institute
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Race, Genetics, and Society
Keywords
critical race theory, racial equity, anti-racism, structural racism, health equity, HIV testing, African Americans, racial consciousness, marginalized communities, racial hierarchy
MeSH terms
Humans, Models, Theoretical, Prejudice, Public Health, United States, Racial Groups, Health Status Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review