Cited by 195Statistical Methods in Clinical TrialsAdvanced Causal Inference TechniquesStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference

Review of recent methodological developments in group-randomized trials: part 2—analysis

Open access
Turner, Elizabeth L., Prague, Melanie, Gallis, John A., Li, Fan, Murray, David M.·2017·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

In 2004, Murray et al. reviewed methodological developments in the design and analysis of group-randomized trials (GRTs). We have updated that review with developments in analysis of the past 13 years, with a companion article to focus on developments in design. We discuss developments in the topics of the earlier review (e.g., methods for parallel-arm GRTs, individually randomized group-treatment trials, and missing data) and in new topics, including methods to account for multiple-level clustering and alternative estimation methods (e.g., augmented generalized estimating equations, targeted maximum likelihood, and quadratic inference functions). In addition, we describe developments in analysis of alternative group designs (including stepped-wedge GRTs, network-randomized trials, and pseudocluster randomized trials), which require clustering to be accounted for in their design and analysis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2017.303707

Cites

253 of 253 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 255 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [31]Fu D A comparison study of general linear mixed moedl and permutation tests in group-randomized trials under non-normal error distributions [Dissertation] Memphis Statistics, University of Memphis 2006
  2. [47]Halekoh U Højsgaard S Yan J The R package geepack for generalized estimating equations Journal of Statistical Software 2006 15 2 1 11
  3. [116]Hutton JL Are distinctive ethical principles required for cluster randomized controlled trials? Stat Med 2001 20 3 473 488 11180314
  4. [141]Robins JM Marginal structural models versus structural nested models as tools for causal inference Halloran ME Berry DA Statistical models in epidemiology, the environment and clinical trials New York Springer 1999 95 134

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Turner, E. L., Prague, M., Gallis, J. A., Li, F., & Murray, D. M.
Affiliations
  • Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique (FR)
  • Elizabeth L. Turner and John A. Gallis are with the Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, and the Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University. Melanie Prague is with the Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, and Inria, project team SISTM, Bordeaux, France. Fan Li is with the Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University. David M. Murray is with the Office of Disease Prevention, Division of Program...
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2017-07
Volume
107
Issue
7
Pages
1078-1086
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2605791502
Cited by
195
References
255
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
11.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH104310)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R37AI051164, R01AI110478)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD075875)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Keywords
group-randomized trials, statistical analysis methods, missing data, quadratic inference function, stepped wedge design
MeSH terms
Humans, Research Design, Models, Statistical, Cluster Analysis, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Population Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review