PreprintCited by 15Climate Change Communication and PerceptionClimate Change Policy and EconomicsRisk Perception and Management

Republicans and Climate Change: An Audience Analysis of Predictors for Belief and Policy Preferences

Open access
Rolfe-Redding, Justin, Maibach, Edward W., Feldman, Lauren, Leiserowitz, Anthony·2012·SSRN Electronic Journal

Abstract

Climate change is increasingly polarized within American politics. Yet, political orientation and climate change views are not synonymous, and research identifying the characteristics of counter-normative groups — such as Republicans concerned about climate change — is key to communication strategies to encourage wider acceptance of science-based views about climate change across the political spectrum. The evidence presented here demonstrates that there are distinct and reliable predictors of which Republicans are more likely to believe that climate change is occurring and express support for mitigation policies. While some of these variables (such as religiosity) are relatively inaccessible to climate change communication campaigns, others (such as correctly understanding the scientific consensus that climate change is happening) should likely form the cornerstone of communication efforts. The current study provides strong guidance on where to begin, and where more research is needed to better understand these phenomena.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2139/ssrn.2026002

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A detailed analysis of Republicans' opinions on climate change revealed perceived consensus to be the strongest predictor of acceptance of climate science.

    “This experimental result meshes well with a detailed analysis of Republicans' opinions on climate change, which similarly revealed perceived consensus to be the strongest predictor of acceptance of climate science [39].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rolfe-Redding, J., Maibach, E. W., Feldman, L., & Leiserowitz, A.
Affiliations
  • George Mason University (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Rolfe-Redding, Justin
Venue
SSRN Electronic Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012
ISSN
1556-5068 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1849106015
Cited by
15
References
68
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
Keywords
climate change beliefs, Republicans, political polarization, climate change communication, religiosity, political orientation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review