Cited by 561Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesForensic and Genetic ResearchEnvironmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Single-stranded DNA library preparation for the sequencing of ancient or damaged DNA

Gansauge, Marie-Theres, Meyer, Matthias·2013·Nature Protocols

Abstract

This protocol describes a method for converting short single-stranded and double-stranded DNA into libraries compatible with high-throughput sequencing using Illumina technology. This method has primarily been developed to improve sequence retrieval from ancient DNA, but it is also applicable to the sequencing of short or degraded DNA from other sources, and it can also be used for sequencing oligonucleotides. Single-stranded library preparation is performed by ligating a biotinylated adapter oligonucleotide to the 3' ends of heat-denatured DNA. The resulting strands are then immobilized on streptavidin-coated beads and copied with a polymerase. A second adapter is attached by blunt-end ligation, and library preparation is completed by PCR amplification. We estimate that intact DNA strands are recovered in the library with ∼50% efficiency. Libraries can be generated from up to 12 DNA or oligonucleotide samples in parallel within 2 d.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nprot.2013.038

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If prepared correctly, immortal DNA sequencing library can be theoretically reamplified indefinitely without exhaustion or loss of complexity.

    “If prepared correctly, this library can be theoretically reamplified indefinitely without exhaustion or loss of complexity 143 .”

    From Ancient DNA analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [143]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Miller, W. et al. Sequencing the nuclear genome of the extinct woolly mammoth. Nature 456, 387–390 (2008). · DOI
  2. Green, R.E. et al. A draft sequence of the Neandertal genome. Science 328, 710–722 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Margulies, M. et al. Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437, 376–380 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  4. McKernan, K.J. et al. Sequence and structural variation in a human genome uncovered by short-read, massively parallel ligation sequencing using two-base encoding. Genome Res. 19, 1527–1541 (2009). · DOI
  5. Rothberg, J.M. et al. An integrated semiconductor device enabling non-optical genome sequencing. Nature 475, 348–352 (2011). · DOI
  6. Briggs, A.W. et al. Targeted retrieval and analysis of five Neandertal mtDNA genomes. Science 325, 318–321 (2009). · DOI
  7. Burbano, H.A. et al. Targeted investigation of the Neandertal genome by array-based sequence capture. Science 328, 723–725 (2010). · DOI
  8. Maricic, T., Whitten, M. & Pääbo, S. Multiplexed DNA sequence capture of mitochondrial genomes using PCR products. PLoS ONE 5 e14004 (2010). · DOI
  9. Avila-Arcos, M.C. et al. Application and comparison of large-scale solution-based DNA capture-enrichment methods on ancient DNA. Sci. Rep. 1, 74 (2011). · DOI
  10. DeAngelis, M.M., Wang, D.G. & Hawkins, T.L. Solid-phase reversible immobilization for the isolation of PCR products. Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 4742–4743 (1995). · DOI
  11. Dabney, J. & Meyer, M. Length and GC-biases during sequencing library amplification: a comparison of various polymerase-buffer systems with ancient and modern DNA sequencing libraries. Biotechniques 52, 87–94 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  12. Gilbert, M.T. et al. The isolation of nucleic acids from fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues—which methods are useful when? PLoS ONE 2, e537 (2007). · DOI
  13. Shi, S.R. et al. DNA extraction from archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections based on the antigen retrieval principle: heating under the influence of pH. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 50, 1005–1011 (2002). · DOI
  14. Hou, Y. et al. Single-cell exome sequencing and monoclonal evolution of a JAK2-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm. Cell 148, 873–885 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  15. Adey, A. et al. Rapid, low-input, low-bias construction of shotgun fragment libraries by high-density in vitro transposition. Genom. Biol. 11, R119 (2010). · DOI
  16. Li, T.W. & Weeks, K.M. Structure-independent and quantitative ligation of single-stranded DNA. Anal. Biochem. 349, 242–246 (2006). · DOI
  17. Meyer, M. & Kircher, M. Illumina sequencing library preparation for highly multiplexed target capture and sequencing. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2010 pdb.prot5448 (2010). · DOI
  18. Brotherton, P. et al. Novel high-resolution characterization of ancient DNA reveals C > U-type base modification events as the sole cause of postmortem miscoding lesions. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 5717–5728 (2007). · DOI
  19. Briggs, A.W. et al. Patterns of damage in genomic DNA sequences from a Neandertal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 14616–14621 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  20. Briggs, A.W. et al. Removal of deaminated cytosines and detection of in vivo methylation in ancient DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, e87 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  21. Krause, J. et al. A complete mtDNA genome of an early modern human from Kostenki, Russia. Curr. Biol. 20, 231–236 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
  22. Rohland, N. & Hofreiter, M. Comparison and optimization of ancient DNA extraction. Biotechniques 42, 343–352 (2007). · DOI
  23. Willerslev, E. & Cooper, A. Ancient DNA. Proc. Biol. Sci. 272, 3–16 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  24. Champlot, S. et al. An efficient multistrategy DNA decontamination procedure of PCR reagents for hypersensitive PCR applications. PLoS ONE 5, e13042 (2010). · DOI
  25. Kircher, M., Heyn, P. & Kelso, J. Addressing challenges in the production and analysis of Illumina sequencing data. BMC Genom. 12, 382 (2011). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gansauge, M.-T., & Meyer, M.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (DE)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Gansauge, Marie-Theres
  • Meyer, Matthias
Venue
Nature Protocols
Published
2013-03-14
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
737-748
ISSN
  • 1750-2799 (ISSN-L)
  • 1754-2189
OpenAlex
W2010018187
Cited by
561
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 5
FWCI
10.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Protocols (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Keywords
single-stranded DNA, ancient DNA, degraded DNA, DNA library preparation, streptavidin-coated beads, oligonucleotide sequencing, next-generation sequencing
MeSH terms
DNA, Single-Stranded, Gene Library, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Sequence Analysis, DNA, DNA Primers, Biotinylation, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review