Cited by 1,596Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisFinancial Literacy and BehaviorDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Financial Literacy and Retirement Preparedness: Evidence and Implications for Financial Education

Lusardi, Annamaria, Mitchelli, Olivia S·2007·Business Economics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2145/20070104

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lusardi, A., & Mitchelli, O. S.
Affiliations
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Business Economics
Published
2007-01
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
35-44
ISSN
  • 0007-666X (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-432X
OpenAlex
W3126062738
Cited by
1,596
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 94 · 2023: 105 · 2022: 122 · 2021: 143 · 2020: 107 · 2019: 109 · 2018: 93 · 2017: 98 · 2016: 83 · 2015: 75 · 2014: 97 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 77
FWCI
156.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Business Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Social Security Administration
  • Australian Government
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy and Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
financial literacy, retirement preparedness, retirement planning, saving behavior, financial education, household wealth, pension privatization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review