Cited by 292Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisFinancial Literacy and BehaviorDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Financial Literacy and Financial Behavior among Young Adults: Evidence and Implications

Open access
de Bassa Scheresberg, Carlo·2013·Numeracy

Abstract

This paper uses data from the 2009 National Financial Capability Study to examine financial literacy and financial behavior in a sample of approximately 4,500 young adults age 25 to 34. The paper finds that most young adults lack basic financial knowledge. Financial literacy is especially low among certain demographic groups, such as women, minorities, and lower-income or less-educated people. A high level of education, however, is not a guarantee of financial literacy. Only 49% of young respondents with a college education and 60% of young respondents with postgraduate education could correctly answer three simple questions designed to assess financial literacy. Results show that respondents who display higher financial literacy or higher confidence in their math or personal finance knowledge have better financial outcomes: they are less likely to use high-cost borrowing methods, and they are more likely to plan for retirement or have set aside savings for emergencies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5038/1936-4660.6.2.5

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Consumers' financial literacy is positively related to their individual likelihood to hold precautionary savings.

    “Finally, de Bassa Scheresberg (2013) documents a positive relation between consumers' financial literacy and their individual likelihood to hold precautionary savings.”

    From Financial literacy, financial advice, and financial behavior (2017) · cites this paper as de Bassa Scheresberg (2013)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Bassa Scheresberg, C.
Venue
Numeracy
Published
2013-07
Volume
6
Issue
2
ISSN
1936-4660 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998824477
Cited by
292
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3
FWCI
43.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Numeracy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
George Washington University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy and Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
financial literacy, financial behavior, young adults, National Financial Capability Study, demographic disparities, personal finance knowledge, retirement planning, emergency savings, financial confidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review