The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the Euclidean action of de Sitter black holes and constrained instantons
Abstract
We compute the on-shell Euclidean action of Schwarzschild-de Sitter black holes, and take their contributions in the gravitational path integral into account using the formalism of constrained instantons. Although Euclidean de Sitter black hole geometries have conical singularities for generic masses, their on-shell action is finite and is shown to be independent of the Euclidean time periodicity and equal to minus the sum of the black hole and cosmological horizon entropy. We apply this result to compute the probability for a nonrotating, neutral arbitrary mass black hole to nucleate spontaneously in empty de Sitter space, which separates into a constant and a “non-perturbative” contribution, the latter corresponding to the proper saddle-point instanton in the Nariai limit. We also speculate on some further applications of our results, most notably as potential non-perturbative corrections to correlators in the de Sitter vacuum.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Hence, quantum de Sitter black holes behave as instantons constraining the states of the original de Sitter degrees of freedom (see, e.g., [137][138][139]).”
From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [137]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Particle creation by black holes
Hawking, S. W. (1975) · Communications In Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02345020 · Cited by 13,106 · cited 1×
“…from their respective horizons, we can assume that both the black hole and the cosmological horizon have an associated temperature and entropy [ 12,55 ] Here, κ b , c and A b , c = Ω d − 2 r d − 2 b , c denote the surface gravity and area of the black hole and cosmological horizon, respectively.”
BackgroundEntanglement wedge reconstruction and the information paradox
Penington, G. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep09(2020)002 · Cited by 968 · cited 1×
“Nevertheless, the recent promising developments in string theory and AdS / CFT addressing black hole unitarity from a bulk perspective [ 7,8 ] , pointing to a special role for the (low energy effective) Euclidean action, seem concrete and tempting enough to test in a de Sitter environment.”
BackgroundThe trouble with de Sitter space
Goheer, N., Kleban, M., & Susskind, L. (2003) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/07/056 · Cited by 281
Cosmological breaking of supersymmetry
BANKS, T. (2001) · International Journal of Modern Physics A · doi:10.1142/s0217751x01003998 · Cited by 248
Black holes as bubble nucleation sites
Gregory, R., Moss, I. G., & Withers, B. (2014) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep03(2014)081 · Cited by 187
ANNINOS, D. (2012) · International Journal of Modern Physics A · doi:10.1142/s0217751x1230013x · Cited by 174
Vacuum metastability with black holes
Burda, P., Gregory, R., & Moss, I. G. (2015) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep08(2015)114 · Cited by 144
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 68
- 10.48550/arXiv.hep-th/0106109 · DOI
- 10.48550/arXiv.hep-th/0110007 · DOI
- 10.1088/1475-7516/2004/11/006 · DOI
- 10.1007/JHEP12(2019)063 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0550-3213(83)90636-3 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.54.6312 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2752 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2738 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1126-6708/2006/12/004 · DOI
- 10.48550/arXiv.1301.5924 · DOI
- 10.48550/arXiv.2003.03637 · DOI
- 10.1088/1361-6382/ab638f · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.L081501 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1142/S0218271897000121 · DOI
- 10.1142/S0218271898000589 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.59.103501 · DOI
- 10.1016/0370-2693(91)90665-D · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.958 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.50.2662 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.51.4302 · DOI
- 10.3390/universe7120464 · DOI
- 10.48550/arXiv.2109.01322 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.126022 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.57.2436 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.65.123508 · DOI
- 10.1088/1126-6708/2002/01/005 · DOI
- 10.48550/arXiv.hep-th/0203258 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.67.104024 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.064016 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.88.044014 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.67.084026 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10714-007-0489-0 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.73.084009 · DOI
- 10.1088/0264-9381/26/10/105010 · DOI
- 10.1143/PTP.122.1239 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.104017 · DOI
- 10.1088/0264-9381/33/24/245001 · DOI
- 10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-3955-6 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.024038 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.125013 · DOI
- 10.1088/1361-6382/ab8bba · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.105.126021 · DOI
- 10.1002/andp.19183611402 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1026602724948 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.024002 · DOI
- 10.1007/JHEP08(2022)075 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/JHEP01(2021)139 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/JHEP06(2020)048 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1126-6708/2002/04/030 · DOI
- 10.21468/SciPostPhys.7.6.079 · DOI
- 10.48550/arXiv.1908.05469 · DOI
- 10.12942/lrr-2011-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.957 · DOI
- 10.21468/SciPostPhys.2.3.016 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.33.2092 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.65.104030 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.47.5370 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.57.3503 · DOI
- 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/11/038 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1126-6708/2001/04/035 · DOI
- 10.1007/JHEP09(2021)001 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00287-X · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.25.330 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.52.2254 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/JHEP01(2020)039 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.58.083511 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.60.063503 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1088/1126-6708/2003/04/021 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer
Panella, E., Pedraza, J. F., & Svesko, A. (2024) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe10090358 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Morvan, E. K., van der Schaar, J. P., & Visser, M. R.
- Affiliations
- Delta Institute for Theoretical Physics
- University of Geneva
- Venue
- SciPost Physics
- Publisher
- Stichting SciPost
- Published
- 2023-02-23
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2542-4653
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 7
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Ministerie van Onderwijs, Cultuur en Wetenschap
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (200020-182513, NCCR 51NF40-141869)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review