Cited by 77Online and Blended LearningTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourTechnology-Enhanced Education Studies

Modeling Key Drivers of E-Learning Satisfaction among Student Teachers

Teo, Timothy, Wong, Su Luan·2013·Journal of Educational Computing Research

Abstract

This study explored the key drivers of student teachers' e-learning satisfaction. Three hundred and eighty-seven participants completed a survey questionnaire measuring their self-reported responses to six constructs (tutor quality, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, course delivery, facilitating conditions, and course satisfaction). Data analysis was performed using structural equation modeling. The results of this study showed that, apart from facilitating conditions, all constructs were significant predictors of e-learning satisfaction. However, facilitating conditions was found to be a significant mediator of perceived ease of use and satisfaction. Some implications for e-learning and teacher education were discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2190/ec.48.1.d

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An additional technology-related element leading to impact was the ease of use of online tools, which enhanced participation and effective online discussion.

    “An additional technology-related element leading to impact was the ease of use of online tools (Hollingsworth and Lim 2015;Ryan and Scott 2008;Teo and Wong 2013), that enhanced participation and effective online discussion.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teo, T., & Wong, S. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • Universiti Putra Malaysia (MY)
Corresponding author
Teo, Timothy
Venue
Journal of Educational Computing Research
Published
2013-01
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
71-95
ISSN
  • 0735-6331 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-4140
OpenAlex
W2095288893
Cited by
77
References
71
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
24.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Educational Computing Research (publishedVersion)
  • Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Putra Malaysia) (acceptedVersion)
  • Murdoch University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
Keywords
e-learning satisfaction, pre-service teachers, teacher professional development, tutor quality, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, course delivery, facilitating conditions, course satisfaction, technology acceptance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review