Cited by 107Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionReligion and Society Interactions

Religiousness and the Trajectory of Self-Rated Health Across Adulthood

McCullough, Michael E., Laurenceau, Jean-Philippe·2005·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

This study evaluates the association of religiousness with the growth parameters characterizing changes in self-rated health during adulthood (ages 20-94 years). Even after controlling for health behaviors, social support/social activity, and four of the Big Five, women who were highly religious in 1940 had higher mean self-rated health throughout their lifespan, slower rates of linear decline, and less pronounced cascades than did less religious women. For men, the associations of religiousness with the growth parameters underlying self-rated health were negligible. Results indicate that the association of religiousness with women’s self-rated health may persist after controlling for mundane mediators and that the association of religiousness and self-rated health is not an artifact of the association between religiousness and the Big Five.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167204271657

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-rated health is strongly related to objective health, that is, future health, health services use, and mortality.

    “While based on participants' subjective impression, self-rated health is strongly related to objective health, that is, future health, health services use, and mortality [505–507].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCullough, M. E., & Laurenceau, J.-P.
Affiliations
University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
McCullough, Michael E.
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2005-04
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
560-573
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2083580906
Cited by
107
References
70
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
Keywords
religiosity, self-rated health, health trajectories, lifespan development, sex differences, Big Five personality traits, health deterioration, cascades, social support, health behavior
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Alcohol Drinking, Attitude to Health, Female, Health Status, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality, Religion, Self Disclosure, Sex Factors, Social Support, Time Factors, Body Mass Index, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review