Cited by 136Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesDigital Mental Health Interventions

Brief Psychotherapy for Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Open access
Nieuwsma, Jason A., Trivedi, Ranak B., McDuffie, Jennifer, Kronish, Ian, Benjamin, Dinesh, Williams, John W.·2012·The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine

Abstract

Objective: Because evidence-based psychotherapies of 12 to 20 sessions can be perceived as too lengthy and time intensive for the treatment of depression in primary care, a number of studies have examined abbreviated psychotherapy protocols. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the efficacy of brief psychotherapy (i.e., < 8 sessions) for depression. Methods: We used combined literature searches in PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and an Internet-accessible database of clinical trials of psychotherapy to conduct two systematic searches: one for existing systematic reviews and another for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Included studies examined evidence-based psychotherapy(s) of eight or fewer sessions, focused on adults with depression, contained an acceptable control condition, were published in English, and used validated measures of depressive symptoms. Results: We retained 2 systematic reviews and 15 RCTs evaluating cognitive behavioral therapy, problem-solving therapy, and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy. The systematic reviews found brief psychotherapies to be more efficacious than control, with effect sizes ranging from −0.33 to −0.25. Our meta-analysis found six to eight sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy to be more efficacious than control (ES −0.42, 95% CI −0.74 to −0.10, I 2 = 56%). A sensitivity analysis controlled for statistical heterogeneity but showed smaller treatment effects (ES −0.24, 95% CI −0.42 to −0.06, I 2 = 0%). Conclusions: Depression can be efficaciously treated with six to eight sessions of psychotherapy, particularly cognitive behavioral therapy and problem-solving therapy. Access to non-pharmacologic treatments for depression could be improved by training healthcare providers to deliver brief psychotherapies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2190/pm.43.2.c

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two meta-analyses looking at brief (8 or fewer sessions) CBT, MBCT, and PST noted significant efficacy in symptom reduction.

    “while 2 other meta-analyses looking at brief (8 or fewer sessions) of CBT, MBCT, and PST noted significant efficacy in symptom reduction.82,83”

    From Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) 2016 Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder (2016) · cites this paper as [83]

    The Results report a significant reduction in depressive symptoms in the meta-analysis of six to eight CBT sessions. The Results also report a positive finding for eight-session MBCT, but that finding came from a single study, not a meta-analysis. For PST, one reviewed analysis found a significant effect when PST and CBT were combined, while another found a statistically nonsignificant effect for PST alone. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [15]Robinson P O'Donohue WT Byrd MR Cummings NA Henderson DA Adapting empirically supported treatments to the primary care setting: A template for success Behavioral Integrative Care: Treatments that work in the primary care setting New York Brunner-Routledge 2005 53 72

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nieuwsma, J. A., Trivedi, R. B., McDuffie, J., Kronish, I., Benjamin, D., & Williams, J. W.
Affiliations
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • Carolina Behavioral Care, Durham
Corresponding author
Nieuwsma, Jason A.
Venue
The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine
Published
2012-02
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
129-151
ISSN
  • 0033-278X (ISSN-L)
  • 0091-2174
  • 1541-3527
OpenAlex
W2024404741
Cited by
135
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23HL098359)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
depression, brief psychotherapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, problem-solving therapy, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, treatment efficacy, primary care, non-pharmacological treatment, health professions education
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Psychotherapy, Brief, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review