Cited by 142Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Accuracy of Apple Watch Measurements for Heart Rate and Energy Expenditure in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: Cross-Sectional Study

Open access
Falter, Maarten, Budts, Werner, Goetschalckx, Kaatje, Cornelissen, Véronique, Buys, Roselien·2019·JMIR mHealth and uHealth

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Wrist-worn tracking devices such as the Apple Watch are becoming more integrated in health care. However, validation studies of these consumer devices remain scarce. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess if mobile health technology can be used for monitoring home-based exercise in future cardiac rehabilitation programs. The purpose was to determine the accuracy of the Apple Watch in measuring heart rate (HR) and estimating energy expenditure (EE) during a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) in patients with cardiovascular disease. METHODS: Forty patients (mean age 61.9 [SD 15.2] yrs, 80% male) with cardiovascular disease (70% ischemic, 22.5% valvular, 7.5% other) completed a graded maximal CPET on a cycle ergometer while wearing an Apple Watch. A 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) was used to measure HR; indirect calorimetry was used for EE. HR was analyzed at three levels of intensity (seated rest, HR1; moderate intensity, HR2; maximal performance, HR3) for 30 seconds. The EE of the entire test was used. Bias or mean difference (MD), standard deviation of difference (SDD), limits of agreement (LoA), mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated. Bland-Altman plots and scatterplots were constructed. RESULTS: SDD for HR1, HR2, and HR3 was 12.4, 16.2, and 12.0 bpm, respectively. Bias and LoA (lower, upper LoA) were 3.61 (-20.74, 27.96) for HR1, 0.91 (-30.82, 32.63) for HR2, and -1.82 (-25.27, 21.63) for HR3. MAE was 6.34 for HR1, 7.55 for HR2, and 6.90 for HR3. MAPE was 10.69% for HR1, 9.20% for HR2, and 6.33% for HR3. ICC was 0.729 (P<.001) for HR1, 0.828 (P<.001) for HR2, and 0.958 (P<.001) for HR3. Bland-Altman plots and scatterplots showed good correlation without systematic error when comparing Apple Watch with ECG measurements. SDD for EE was 17.5 kcal. Bias and LoA were 30.47 (-3.80, 64.74). MAE was 30.77; MAPE was 114.72%. ICC for EE was 0.797 (P<.001). The Bland-Altman plot and a scatterplot directly comparing Apple Watch and indirect calorimetry showed systematic bias with an overestimation of EE by the Apple Watch. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cardiovascular disease, the Apple Watch measures HR with clinically acceptable accuracy during exercise. If confirmed, it might be considered safe to incorporate the Apple Watch in HR-guided training programs in the setting of cardiac rehabilitation. At this moment, however, it is too early to recommend the Apple Watch for cardiac rehabilitation. Also, the Apple Watch systematically overestimates EE in this group of patients. Caution might therefore be warranted when using the Apple Watch for measuring EE.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/11889

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [18]McArdle W Katch F Katch V McArdle W Katch F Katch V Measurement of human energy expenditure Nutrition, Energy, and Human Performance. 7th edition 2010 Philadelphia Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 178 192

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Falter, M., Budts, W., Goetschalckx, K., Cornelissen, V., & Buys, R.
Affiliations
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Buys, Roselien
Venue
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
Published
2019-03-19
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
e11889
ISSN
2291-5222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2904020811
Cited by
142
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR mhealth and uhealth (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
Apple Watch, heart rate measurement, energy expenditure estimation, cardiovascular disease, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, wearable devices, device validation, mobile health, cardiac rehabilitation, indirect calorimetry, electrocardiogram, ischemic heart disease, valvular heart disease, exercise intensity, measurement accuracy, limits of agreement, intraclass correlation coefficient, mean absolute error, mean absolute percentage error
MeSH terms
Heart Rate Determination, Wearable Electronic Devices, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cross-Sectional Studies, Electrocardiography, Energy Metabolism, Exercise Test, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review