Cited by 337Physical Activity and HealthNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Accuracy of Heart Rate Watches: Implications for Weight Management

Open access
Wallen, Matthew P., Gomersall, Sjaan R., Keating, Shelley E., Wisløff, Ulrik, Coombes, Jeff S.·2016·PLOS ONE

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Wrist-worn monitors claim to provide accurate measures of heart rate and energy expenditure. People wishing to lose weight use these devices to monitor energy balance, however the accuracy of these devices to measure such parameters has not been established. AIM: To determine the accuracy of four wrist-worn devices (Apple Watch, Fitbit Charge HR, Samsung Gear S and Mio Alpha) to measure heart rate and energy expenditure at rest and during exercise. METHODS: Twenty-two healthy volunteers (50% female; aged 24 ± 5.6 years) completed ~1-hr protocols involving supine and seated rest, walking and running on a treadmill and cycling on an ergometer. Data from the devices collected during the protocol were compared with reference methods: electrocardiography (heart rate) and indirect calorimetry (energy expenditure). RESULTS: None of the devices performed significantly better overall, however heart rate was consistently more accurate than energy expenditure across all four devices. Correlations between the devices and reference methods were moderate to strong for heart rate (0.67-0.95 [0.35 to 0.98]) and weak to strong for energy expenditure (0.16-0.86 [-0.25 to 0.95]). All devices underestimated both outcomes compared to reference methods. The percentage error for heart rate was small across the devices (range: 1-9%) but greater for energy expenditure (9-43%). Similarly, limits of agreement were considerably narrower for heart rate (ranging from -27.3 to 13.1 bpm) than energy expenditure (ranging from -266.7 to 65.7 kcals) across devices. CONCLUSION: These devices accurately measure heart rate. However, estimates of energy expenditure are poor and would have implications for people using these devices for weight loss.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0154420

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [5]Smart watches and Smart Bands Dominate Fast-Growing Wearables Market. CCS Insight. 2014. Available: http://www.ccsinsight.com/press/company-news/1944-smartwatchesand-smart-bands-dominate-fast-growing-wearables-market.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wallen, M. P., Gomersall, S. R., Keating, S. E., Wisløff, U., & Coombes, J. S.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Corresponding author
Coombes, Jeff S.
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2016-05-27
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
e0154420
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2395644623
Cited by
336
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 6
FWCI
42.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • FedUni ResearchOnline (Federation University Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Coca-Cola
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
heart rate monitors, wrist-worn devices, energy expenditure, measurement accuracy, weight loss, wearable activity trackers, Apple Watch, Fitbit, physical activity, energy balance, indirect calorimetry, electrocardiogram
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Body Weight, Energy Metabolism, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Wrist, Young Adult, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review