Cited by 26Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Measuring Adherence Within a Self-Guided Online Intervention for Depression and Anxiety: Secondary Analyses of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access
Hanano, Maria, Rith-Najarian, Leslie, Boyd, Meredith, Chavira, Denise·2022·JMIR Mental Health

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Self-guided online interventions offer users the ability to participate in an intervention at their own pace and address some traditional service barriers (eg, attending in-person appointments, cost). However, these interventions suffer from high dropout rates, and current literature provides little guidance for defining and measuring online intervention adherence as it relates to clinical outcomes. Objective: This study aims to develop and test multiple measures of adherence to a specific self-guided online intervention, as guided by best practices from the literature. Methods: We conducted secondary analyses on data from a randomized controlled trial of an 8-week online cognitive behavioral program that targets depression and anxiety in college students. We defined multiple behavioral and attitudinal adherence measures at varying levels of effort (ie, low, moderate, and high). Linear regressions were run with adherence terms predicting improvement in the primary outcome measure, the 21-item Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21). Results: Of the 947 participants, 747 initiated any activity and 449 provided posttest data. Results from the intent-to-treat sample indicated that high level of effort for behavioral adherence significantly predicted symptom change (F4,746=17.18, P<.001; and β=–.26, P=.04). Moderate level of effort for attitudinal adherence also significantly predicted symptom change (F4,746=17.25, P<.001; and β=–.36, P=.03). Results differed in the initiators-only sample, such that none of the adherence measures significantly predicted symptom change (P=.09-.27). Conclusions: Our findings highlight the differential results of dose-response models testing adherence measures in predicting clinical outcomes. We summarize recommendations that might provide helpful guidance to future researchers and intervention developers aiming to investigate online intervention adherence. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04361045; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04361045

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/30754

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [16]Rith-Najarian L A dissemination and implementation approach to preventing anxiety and depression in young people Doctoral dissertation, University of California Los Angeles 2019 2022-01-26 https://escholarship.org/content/qt6786366q/qt6786366q.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hanano, M., Rith-Najarian, L., Boyd, M., & Chavira, D.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Hanano, Maria
Venue
JMIR Mental Health
Published
2022-03-28
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
e30754
ISSN
2368-7959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3199029986
Cited by
26
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Mental Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
depression, anxiety, university students, cognitive behavioral therapy, behavioral adherence, dropout, dose-response relationship, DASS-21, mental health interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review