Cited by 1,191Sleep and related disordersObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchMental Health Treatment and Access

Epidemiology of insomnia: Prevalence, self-help treatments, consultations, and determinants of help-seeking behaviors

MORIN, C, LEBLANC, M, DALEY, M, GREGOIRE, J, MERETTE, C·2006·Sleep Medicine

Abstract

Background and purpose To estimate the prevalence of insomnia symptoms and syndrome in the general population, describe the types of self-help treatments and consultations initiated for insomnia, and examine help-seeking determinants. Patients and methods A randomly selected sample of 2001 French-speaking adults from the province of Quebec (Canada) responded to a telephone survey about sleep, insomnia, and its treatments. Results Of the total sample, 25.3% were dissatisfied with their sleep, 29.9% reported insomnia symptoms, and 9.5% met criteria for an insomnia syndrome. Thirteen percent of the respondents had consulted a healthcare provider specifically for insomnia in their lifetime, with general practitioners being the most frequently consulted. Daytime fatigue (48%), psychological distress (40%), and physical discomfort (22%) were the main determinants prompting individuals with insomnia to seek treatment. Of the total sample, 15% had used at least once herbal/dietary products to facilitate sleep and 11% had used prescribed sleep medications in the year preceding the survey. Other self-help strategies employed to facilitate sleep included reading, listening to music, and relaxation. Conclusions These findings confirm the high prevalence of insomnia in the general population. While few insomnia sufferers seek professional consultations, many individuals initiate self-help treatments, particularly when daytime impairments such as fatigue become more noticeable. Improved kn…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sleep.2005.08.008

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The course of insomnia is often chronic, with studies showing persistence in 50% to 85% of individuals over follow-up intervals of one to several years.

    “The course of insomnia is of -ten chronic, with studies showing persistence in 50% to 85% of individuals over follow-up intervals of one to several years. 14”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MORIN, C., LEBLANC, M., DALEY, M., GREGOIRE, J., & MERETTE, C.
Affiliations
  • Hôpital du Saint-Sacrement (CA)
  • Université Laval (CA)
Corresponding author
MORIN, C
Venue
Sleep Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-03
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
123-130
ISSN
1389-9457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030710544
Cited by
1,191
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 44 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 86 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 79 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 81 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 71 · 2013: 71 · 2012: 48
FWCI
32.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sleep Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
insomnia, insomnia prevalence, help-seeking, self-help treatment, daytime fatigue, psychological distress, sleep medication, general practitioners
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Demography, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Referral and Consultation, Self-Help Groups, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review