Cited by 53Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsInnovation in Digital Healthcare SystemsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Mining Health App Data to Find More and Less Successful Weight Loss Subgroups

Open access
Serrano, Katrina J, Yu, Mandi, Coa, Kisha I, Collins, Linda M, Atienza, Audie A·2016·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: More than half of all smartphone app downloads involve weight, diet, and exercise. If successful, these lifestyle apps may have far-reaching effects for disease prevention and health cost-savings, but few researchers have analyzed data from these apps. OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to analyze data from a commercial health app (Lose It!) in order to identify successful weight loss subgroups via exploratory analyses and to verify the stability of the results. METHODS: Cross-sectional, de-identified data from Lose It! were analyzed. This dataset (n=12,427,196) was randomly split into 24 subsamples, and this study used 3 subsamples (combined n=972,687). Classification and regression tree methods were used to explore groupings of weight loss with one subsample, with descriptive analyses to examine other group characteristics. Data mining validation methods were conducted with 2 additional subsamples. RESULTS: In subsample 1, 14.96% of users lost 5% or more of their starting body weight. Classification and regression tree analysis identified 3 distinct subgroups: "the occasional users" had the lowest proportion (4.87%) of individuals who successfully lost weight; "the basic users" had 37.61% weight loss success; and "the power users" achieved the highest percentage of weight loss success at 72.70%. Behavioral factors delineated the subgroups, though app-related behavioral characteristics further distinguished them. Results were replicated in further analyses with separate subsamples. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that distinct subgroups can be identified in "messy" commercial app data and the identified subgroups can be replicated in independent samples. Behavioral factors and use of custom app features characterized the subgroups. Targeting and tailoring information to particular subgroups could enhance weight loss success. Future studies should replicate data mining analyses to increase methodology rigor.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.5473

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [29]Robin X Turck N Hainard A Tiberti N Lisacek F R-project 2015-12-21 Package 'pROC' https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pROC/pROC.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Serrano, K. J., Yu, M., Coa, K. I., Collins, L. M., & Atienza, A. A.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • ICF International (United States) (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Serrano, Katrina J
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2016-06-14
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
e154
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2424092482
Cited by
53
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
FWCI
13.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Innovation in Digital Healthcare Systems
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
weight loss, mobile health apps, user subgroups, classification and regression trees, behavioral factors, app usage patterns
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Body Weight, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diet, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Random Allocation, Weight Loss, Exercise, Cell Phone, Young Adult, Data Mining, Mobile Applications, Datasets as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review