Cited by 85Digital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMental Health Research Topics

Depression Screening Using Daily Mental-Health Ratings from a Smartphone Application for Breast Cancer Patients

Open access
Kim, Junetae, Lim, Sanghee, Min, Yul Ha, Shin, Yong-Wook, Lee, Byungtae, Sohn, Guiyun, Jung, Kyung Hae, Lee, Jae-Ho +4 more·2016·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mobile mental-health trackers are mobile phone apps that gather self-reported mental-health ratings from users. They have received great attention from clinicians as tools to screen for depression in individual patients. While several apps that ask simple questions using face emoticons have been developed, there has been no study examining the validity of their screening performance. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we (1) evaluate the potential of a mobile mental-health tracker that uses three daily mental-health ratings (sleep satisfaction, mood, and anxiety) as indicators for depression, (2) discuss three approaches to data processing (ratio, average, and frequency) for generating indicator variables, and (3) examine the impact of adherence on reporting using a mobile mental-health tracker and accuracy in depression screening. METHODS: We analyzed 5792 sets of daily mental-health ratings collected from 78 breast cancer patients over a 48-week period. Using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) as the measure of true depression status, we conducted a random-effect logistic panel regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to evaluate the screening performance of the mobile mental-health tracker. In addition, we classified patients into two subgroups based on their adherence level (higher adherence and lower adherence) using a k-means clustering algorithm and compared the screening accuracy between the two groups. RESULTS: With the ratio approach, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) is 0.8012, indicating that the performance of depression screening using daily mental-health ratings gathered via mobile mental-health trackers is comparable to the results of PHQ-9 tests. Also, the AUC is significantly higher (P=.002) for the higher adherence group (AUC=0.8524) than for the lower adherence group (AUC=0.7234). This result shows that adherence to self-reporting is associated with a higher accuracy of depression screening. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the potential of a mobile mental-health tracker as a tool for screening for depression in practice. Also, this study provides clinicians with a guideline for generating indicator variables from daily mental-health ratings. Furthermore, our results provide empirical evidence for the critical role of adherence to self-reporting, which represents crucial information for both doctors and patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.5598

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [37]Hill RC Griffiths WE Lim GC Principles of Econometrics. 4th edition 2011 Hoboken, NJ Wiley
  2. [46]Shmueli G Patel N Bruce P Data Mining for Business Intelligence: Concepts, Techniques, and Applications in Microsoft Office Excel with XLMiner. 2nd edition 2010 Hoboken, NJ Wiley

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, J., Lim, S., Min, Y. H., Shin, Y.-W., Lee, B., Sohn, G., Jung, K. H., Lee, J.-H., Son, B. H., Ahn, S. H., Shin, S.-Y., & Lee, J. W.
Affiliations
  • Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Gachon University (KR)
  • Asan Medical Center (KR)
Corresponding author
Lee, Jong Won
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2016-08-04
Volume
18
Issue
8
Pages
e216
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2498898584
Cited by
85
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10
FWCI
14.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Gachon University (GCU-2015-0049)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
depression screening, mobile application, breast cancer patients, sleep satisfaction, mood, anxiety, PHQ-9, screening accuracy
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Breast Neoplasms, Depression, Female, Humans, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, ROC Curve, Telemedicine, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review