PreprintCited by 5Digital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsCancer survivorship and care

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Engagement With an Internet-Administered, Guided, Low-Intensity Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Intervention for Parents of Children Treated for Cancer: Analysis of Log-Data From the ENGAGE Feasibility Trial (Preprint)

Open access
Reuther, Christina, von Essen, Louise, Mustafa, Mudassir Imran, Saarijärvi, Markus, Woodford, Joanne·2024·JMIR Formative Research

Preprint — published as 10.2196/67171

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Parents of children treated for cancer may experience psychological difficulties including depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress. Digital interventions, such as internet-administered cognitive behavioral therapy, offer an accessible and flexible means to support parents. However, engagement with and adherence to digital interventions remain a significant challenge, potentially limiting efficacy. Understanding factors influencing user engagement and adherence is crucial for enhancing the acceptability, feasibility, and efficacy of these interventions. We developed an internet-administered, guided, low-intensity cognitive behavioral therapy (LICBT)–based self-help intervention for parents of children treated for cancer, (EJDeR [internetbaserad självhjälp för föräldrar till barn som avslutat en behandling mot cancer or internet-based self-help for parents of children who have completed cancer treatment]). EJDeR included 2 LICBT techniques—behavioral activation and worry management. Subsequently, we conducted the ENGAGE feasibility trial and EJDeR was found to be acceptable and feasible. However, intervention adherence rates were marginally under progression criteria. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to (1) describe user engagement with the EJDeR intervention and examine whether (2) sociodemographic characteristics differed between adherers and nonadherers, (3) depression and anxiety scores differed between adherers and nonadherers at baseline, (4) user engagement differed between adherers and nonadherers, and (5) user engagement differed between fathers and mothers. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of ENGAGE data, including 71 participants. User engagement data were collected through log-data tracking, for example, communication with e-therapists, homework submissions, log-ins, minutes working with EJDeR, and modules completed. Chi-square tests examined differences between adherers and nonadherers and fathers and mothers concerning categorical data. Independent-samples t tests examined differences regarding continuous variables. RESULTS: Module completion rates were higher among those who worked with behavioral activation as their first LICBT module versus worry management. Of the 20 nonadherers who opened the first LICBT module allocated, 30% (n=6) opened behavioral activation and 70% (n=14) opened worry management. No significant differences in sociodemographic characteristics were found. Nonadherers who opened behavioral activation as the first LICBT module allocated had a significantly higher level of depression symptoms at baseline than adherers. No other differences in depression and anxiety scores between adherers and nonadherers were found. Minutes working with EJDeR, number of log-ins, days using EJDeR, number of written messages sent to e-therapists, number of written messages sent to participants, and total number of homework exercises submitted were significantly higher among adherers than among nonadherers. There were no significant differences between fathers and mothers regarding user engagement variables. CONCLUSIONS: Straightforward techniques, such as behavioral activation, may be well-suited for digital delivery, and more complex techniques, such as worry management, may require modifications to improve user engagement. User engagement was measured behaviorally, for example, through log-data tracking, and future research should measure emotional and cognitive components of engagement. CLINICALTRIAL: ISRCTN Registry 57233429; https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN57233429

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/preprints.67171

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 80

  1. 10.1002/wps.20610 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1186/s12888-022-04325-z · DOI
  3. 10.1017/s0033291721001999 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.4364 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1002/wps.21088 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100389 · DOI
  7. 10.2196/50113 · DOI
  8. 10.2196/29280 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100553 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.12.015 · DOI
  11. 10.2196/14728 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107109 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.06.015 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.21037/mhealth.2018.08.04 · DOI
  15. 10.2196/24387 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1016/j.invent.2019.100267 · DOI
  17. 10.2196/jmir.8578 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0044 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.2196/jmir.9397 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1002/wps.20151 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.2196/mental.8363 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.2196/43727 · DOI
  23. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00926 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/s13142-016-0453-1 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.2196/24239 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.invent.2018.03.006 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.2196/10966 · DOI
  28. 10.1371/journal.pone.0150205 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1002/cam4.5377 · DOI
  30. 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023708 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1371/journal.pone.0157076 · DOI
  32. 10.7717/peerj.4570 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.2196/jmir.9457 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100572 · DOI
  35. 10.2196/10085 · DOI
  36. 10.2196/22709 · DOI
  37. 10.1371/journal.pone.0103340 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1002/pon.3856 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1016/j.jad.2013.02.030 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.2196/jmir.2104 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.17705/1cais.02428 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1037/pas0001130.supp · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.01.001 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.845138 · DOI
  48. 10.2196/47321 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.brat.2014.06.008 · DOI
  50. 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026137 · DOI
  51. 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300881 · DOI
  52. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.10918 · DOI
  53. 10.1093/jamia/ocab254 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.2196/17757 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.2196/16197 · DOI
  56. 10.1016/j.invent.2024.100735 · DOI
  57. 10.1007/s12529-016-9556-9 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.2196/jmir.1194 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1177/20552076241228403 · DOI
  60. 10.1093/tbm/ibaa098 · DOI
  61. 10.2196/10754 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1186/s40359-021-00663-x · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1186/s44247-023-00048-7 · DOI
  64. 10.7150/jca.82632 · DOI
  65. 10.1016/j.invent.2020.100311 · DOI
  66. 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1236895 · DOI
  67. 10.1177/20552076241260513 · DOI
  68. 10.2196/30000 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.2196/15795 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037643 · DOI
  71. 10.1037/amp0000983 · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.1111/ajpy.12170 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1371/journal.pone.0218860 · DOI
  74. 10.3390/cancers13225597 · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.2196/18826 · DOI
  76. 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103187 · DOI · Paper page
  77. 10.1093/iwc/iwae030 · DOI
  78. 10.2196/45409 · DOI
  79. 10.4324/9781315385907 · DOI · Paper page
  80. 10.2196/15972 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Reuther, C., von Essen, L., Mustafa, M. I., Saarijärvi, M., & Woodford, J.
Affiliations
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Venue
JMIR Formative Research
Published
2024-10-07
Volume
9
Pages
e67171-e67171
ISSN
2561-326X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406887636
Cited by
5
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2
FWCI
4.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Formative Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, parental engagement, intervention adherence, behavioral activation, parents of children with cancer, childhood cancer survivors, depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress, digital mental health interventions, gender differences in engagement, log analysis, self-help intervention, feasibility, acceptability, sociodemographic predictors
MeSH terms
Internet-Based Intervention, Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Child, Depression, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Parents, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review