The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Combining Digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy With Mindfulness Training for Binge Eating Disorder: Protocol for a Feasibility Trial (Preprint)
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.2196/91761 · Paper page
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is the most effective treatment for binge eating disorder (BED) but is limited by modest efficacy and low reach of in-person delivery. Combining mindfulness training with CBT could enhance efficacy by targeting emotion dysregulation, a key factor in BED that CBT does not adequately target. Digital delivery can enhance the reach of treatment. Accordingly, we developed CBT-based Mindful Courage, a 16-session digital intervention combining CBT and mindfulness training for BED. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial to evaluate the feasibility (intervention and assessment completion) and acceptability (usability, overall satisfaction, engagement, visual appeal of content, understandability of program content, desire to continue the program, perceived skill acquisition, perceived confidence in implementing skills, and perceived helpfulness) of CBT-based Mindful Courage. We will also evaluate changes in outcomes (binge eating frequency, eating disorder symptoms, clinical impairment, and depression symptoms) and mechanisms (emotion dysregulation, dietary overrestriction, and trait mindfulness). METHODS: This is a parallel-group, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio. It will be conducted from November 2025 to November 2026, with study assessments at baseline, midtreatment, end-of-treatment, and 2-month follow-up. We will recruit a volunteer sample of adults with BED (N=40) aged 18 to 75 years via online advertisements. Exclusion criteria include a BMI <18.5, current anorexia or bulimia nervosa, and current treatment for BED or weight loss. Participants will be randomly allocated to an active control that includes coached self-monitoring (self-monitoring of food intake in Recovery Record and coaching calls by a research assistant) or to CBT-based Mindful Courage+coached self-monitoring. Both conditions will have a duration of 18 weeks. All study sessions will take place over Zoom. RESULTS: The study was funded in April 2023. Data collection began in November 2025, and we anticipate recruitment to be completed by November 2026. Results are expected to be analyzed by May 2027 and published by May 2028. CONCLUSIONS: This will be an important first step in creating a scalable and efficacious treatment for BED. CLINICALTRIAL: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT07212673; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07212673 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT: DERR1-10.2196/91761
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 67
Research works printed but not linked: 66
- 10.1016/s2215-0366(21)00040-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.psc.2017.01.003 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.03.040 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/eat.22452 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0024455 · DOI
- 10.1186/s12888-024-05943-5 · DOI
- 10.1007/s40519-014-0173-9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/s0005-7967(02)00088-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.brat.2015.04.010 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0023660 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.12.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.12.008 · DOI
- 10.1017/s0033291713001098 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S0033291716003317 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1745691611419671 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10865-014-9610-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s12671-019-01216-5 · DOI
- 10.1002/erv.2673 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.beth.2023.01.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/eat.23564 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.03.004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/10640266.2019.1591827 · DOI
- 10.1017/s0033291721001999 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.sleep.2020.08.020 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.03.009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1357633x17717402 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/ccp0000575 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/erv.3204 · DOI
- 10.1002/fgc.33961 · DOI
- 10.1177/2167702613497932 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101338 · DOI
- 10.2196/jmir.4790 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s12160-009-9130-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cbpra.2015.12.005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/b978-0-12-416031-6.00007-4 · DOI
- 10.1002/eat.23512 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s12671-012-0179-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/shi.90 · DOI
- 10.1002/eat.22386 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/erv.3053 · DOI
- 10.1002/eat.23652 · DOI
- 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15633 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/eat.22477 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.brat.2009.05.006 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1201/9781498710411-35 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/t03974-000 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.brat.2008.06.012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/eat.20931 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.psychres.2003.03.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.psychres.2006.08.002 · DOI
- 10.1177/1049732320924625 · DOI
- 10.1002/eat.20665 · DOI
- 10.1002/eat.20653 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10862-015-9529-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10862-006-9035-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10862-019-09736-z · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/0963823031000103489 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/s0005-7894(00)80009-x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/1098-108x(198707)6:4<485::aid-eat2260060405>3.0.co;2-o · DOI
- 10.1016/0306-4603(82)90024-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/1040-3590.12.2.123 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Sala, M., Roos, C., Ascarrunz, D., Stern, C. M., Bricker, J., Feldman, J. M., Levinson, C., Aslan, M., Hay, J. L., & Kober, H.
- Affiliations
- Yeshiva University (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- University of Louisville (US)
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sala, Margaret
- ORCID
- Venue
- JMIR Research Protocols
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2026-01-19
- Volume
- 15
- Pages
- e91761-e91761
- ISSN
- 1929-0748 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC13135158
- OpenAlex
- W7134927003
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 67
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- JMIR Research Protocols (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (K23AT012126)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Keywords
- binge eating disorder, digital cognitive behavioral therapy, mindfulness training, emotional dysregulation, trait mindfulness, self-monitoring, treatment acceptability, feasibility, depressive symptoms, eating disorder symptoms, telehealth intervention, eating disorder prevention
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Binge-Eating Disorder, Mindfulness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review