Cited by 46ECG Monitoring and AnalysisCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Comparing 14-day Adhesive Patch With 24-h Holter Monitoring

Cheung, Christopher C, Kerr, Charles R, Krahn, Andrew D·2014·Future Cardiology

Abstract

Barrett PM, Komatireddy R, Haaser S et al. Comparison of 24-hour Holter monitoring with 14-day novel adhesive patch electrocardiographic monitoring. Am. J. Med. 127(1), 95.e11–95.e17 (2014). The investigation of cardiac arrhythmias in the outpatient ambulatory setting has traditionally been initiated with the Holter monitor. Using the continuous recording over 24 or 48 h, the Holter monitor permits the detection of baseline rhythm, dysrhythmia and conduction abnormalities, including heart block and changes in the ST segment that may indicate myocardial ischemia. However, apart from the bulkiness and inconvenience of the device itself, the lack of extended monitoring results in a diagnostic yield of typically less than 20%. In this study by Barrett et al., 146 patients referred for the evaluation of cardiac arrhythmia were prospectively enrolled to wear both the 24-h Holter monitor and 14-day adhesive patch monitor (Zio Patch) simultaneously. The primary outcome was the detection of any one of six arrhythmias: supraventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation/flutter, pause >3 s, atrioventricular block, ventricular tachycardia, or polymorphic ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation. The adhesive patch monitor detected more arrhythmia events compared with the Holter monitor over the total wear time (96 vs. 61 events; p < 0.001), although the Holter monitor detected more events during the initial 24-h monitoring period (61 vs. 52 events; p = 0.013). Novel, single-lead, intermediate-duration, user-friendly adhesive patch monitoring devices, such as the Zio Patch, represent the changing face of ambulatory ECG monitoring. However, the loss of quality, automated rhythm analysis and inability to detect myocardial ischemia continue to remain important issues that will need to be addressed prior to the implementation of these new devices.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2217/fca.14.24

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheung, C. C., Kerr, C. R., & Krahn, A. D.
Affiliations
Arrhythmia Service 9th Floor Gordon &amp; Leslie Diamond Health Care Centre 2775 Laurel Street Vancouver BC V5Z 1M9 Canada
Venue
Future Cardiology
Published
2014-05
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
319-322
ISSN
  • 1479-6678 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-8298
OpenAlex
W2149007105
Cited by
46
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Future Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Keywords
24-hour Holter monitoring, Holter monitoring, arrhythmia detection, supraventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia, atrioventricular block, myocardial ischemia detection, single-lead ECG
MeSH terms
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Electrocardiography, Female, Humans, Male, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review