The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Antecedents and Outcomes of Organizational Commitment
Abstract
This study examines the antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment within a cross-validational framework. The study was carried out among 382 hospital employees and 119 R/D scientists and engineers. It was found that major influences on commitment arise from personal, job, and organizational characteristics for both samples. Moreover, commitment was found to be strongly related to intent and desire to remain for both samples and moderately related to attendance and job performance for one sample. A model of organizational commitment is proposed and evaluated in the light of these data. Results are compared with earlier findings and implications for future research are discussed. (Author)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-z · Cited by 11,049
The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing
Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800302 · Cited by 22,355
Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature.
Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698 · Cited by 7,592
The impact of interpersonal environment on burnout and organizational commitment
Leiter, M. P., & Maslach, C. (1988) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.4030090402 · Cited by 1,597
Antecedents to Customer Expectations for Service Recovery
Kelley, S. W., & Davis, M. A. (1994) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070394221005 · Cited by 673
The validation of the turnover intention scale
Bothma, C. F. C., & Roodt, G. (2013) · SA Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.4102/sajhrm.v11i1.507 · Cited by 570
Nazir, O., & Islam, J. U. (2017) · South Asian Journal of Business Studies · doi:10.1108/sajbs-04-2016-0036 · Cited by 230
Conventional vs. Worker-Owned Organizations
Rhodes, S. R., & Steers, R. M. (1981) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872678103401201 · Cited by 223
Self-citationEmployees' affective commitment to change: The key to successful CRM implementation
Shum, P., Bove, L., & Auh, S. (2008) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090560810903709 · Cited by 159
The interplay of customer experience and commitment
Keiningham, T., Ball, J., Benoit (née Moeller), S., Bruce, H. L., Buoye, A., Dzenkovska, J., Nasr, L., Ou, Y.-C., & Zaki, M. (2017) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/jsm-09-2016-0337 · Cited by 156
Hurst, J. L., & Good, L. K. (2009) · Career Development International · doi:10.1108/13620430910997303 · Cited by 140
Work identities of nurses: Between caring and efficiency demands
Kirpal, S. (2004) · Career Development International · doi:10.1108/13620430410535850 · Cited by 134
Strutton, D., Pelton, L. E., & Lumpkin, J. R. (1993) · Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management · doi:10.1080/08853134.1993.10753963 · Cited by 101
Steffy, B. D., & Jones, J. W. (1988) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/0001-8791(88)90014-0 · Cited by 76
Maruping, L. M., Daniel, S. L., & Cataldo, M. (2019) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2019/13928 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Steers, R. M.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1977-03
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 46
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1973740440
- Cited by
- 2,057
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
