Handbook of Organizational Communication.

Tubbs, Stewart L., Jablin, Frederic M., Putnam, Linda L., Roberts, Karlene H., Porter, Lyman W.·1988·Administrative Science Quarterly

DOI 10.2307/2392723

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2392723

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures
Huber, G. P. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.88 · Cited by 8,072
The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory.
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 · Cited by 5,882
Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward
Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2014.873177 · Cited by 1,764
Unpacking the Concept of Virtuality: The Effects of Geographic Dispersion, Electronic Dependence, Dynamic Structure, and National Diversity on Team Innovation
Gibson, C. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2006) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.51.3.451 · Cited by 1,152
Internal and external integration for product development: the contingency effects of uncertainty, equivocality, and platform strategy
Koufteros, X., Vonderembse, M., & Jayaram, J. (2005) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2005.00067.x · Cited by 855
Millennials in the Workplace: A Communication Perspective on Millennials’ Organizational Relationships and Performance
Myers, K. K., & Sadaghiani, K. (2010) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9172-7 · Cited by 811
1 Constitutional Amendments: “Materializing” Organizational Communication
Ashcraft, K. L., Kuhn, T. R., & Cooren, F. (2009) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520903047186 · Cited by 731
CSR as aspirational talk
Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Thyssen, O. (2013) · Organization · doi:10.1177/1350508413478310 · Cited by 591
Introduction to the Special Issue: Communication Processes for Virtual Organizations
DeSanctis, G., & Monge, P. (1999) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.10.6.693 · Cited by 495
Distributing Leadership to Make Schools Smarter: Taking the Ego Out of the System
Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., Strauss, T., Sacks, R., Memon, N., & Yashkina, A. (2007) · Leadership and Policy in Schools · doi:10.1080/15700760601091267 · Cited by 485
Does adviser mentoring add value? A longitudinal study of mentoring and doctoral student outcomes
Paglis, L. L., Green, S. G., & Bauer, T. N. (2006) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-005-9003-2 · Cited by 474
A Social Network Contagion Theory of Risk Perception
Scherer, C. W., & Cho, H. (2003) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/1539-6924.00306 · Cited by 355
Studying Complex Discursive Systems..: Centering Resonance Analysis of Communication
Corman, S. R., Kuhn, T., Mcphee, R. D., & Dooley, K. J. (2002) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00802.x · Cited by 274
When change-oriented feedback enhances motivation, well-being and performance: A look at autonomy-supportive feedback in sport
Carpentier, J., & Mageau, G. A. (2013) · Psychology of Sport and Exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.01.003 · Cited by 217
Multiple levels of analysis from a longitudinal perspective: Some implications for theory building
Dansereau, F., Yammarino, F. J., & Kohles, J. C. (1999) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259086 · Cited by 217
Innovation Modification during Intraorganizational Adoption
Lewis, L. K., & Seibold, D. R. (1993) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258762 · Cited by 193
The role of quality in e‐procurement performance: An empirical analysis
Vaidyanathan, G., & Devaraj, S. (2008) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2007.08.004 · Cited by 133
Different relationships for coping with ambiguity and uncertainty in organizations
Saint-Charles, J., & Mongeau, P. (2009) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2008.09.001 · Cited by 91
Comparing Online Information Effects: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Online Information and Uncertainty Avoidance
Vishwanath, A. (2003) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650203257838 · Cited by 88
Leveling the Organizational Playing Field—Virtually: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Research Assessing the Impact of Group Support System Use on Member Influence Behaviors
Rains, S. A. (2005) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650204273763 · Cited by 74
More than friends: Popularity on Facebook and its role in impression formation
Scott, G. G. (2014) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/jcc4.12067 · Cited by 66
Communication and stability in social collectives
Bradley, R. T., & Pribram, K. H. (1998) · Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems · doi:10.1016/s1061-7361(99)80005-8 · Cited by 32
The Dialectical Tensions in the Funding Infrastructure of Cyberinfrastructure
Kee, K. F., & Browning, L. D. (2010) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-010-9116-9 · Cited by 27

Authors: Tubbs, S. L., Jablin, F. M., Putnam, L. L., Roberts, K. H., & Porter, L. W.
Venue: Administrative Science Quarterly
Publisher: JSTOR
Published: 1988-09
Volume: 33
Issue: 3
Pages: 467
ISSN: 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.2307/2392723
OpenAlex: W2326534254
Cited by: 1,401
References: 0
FWCI: 306.30
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review