The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EXPERIENTIAL EFFECTS OF DIALECTICAL INQUIRY, DEVIL'S ADVOCACY AND CONSENSUS APPROACHES TO STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING.
Abstract
This longitudinal laboratory study of fast-advancing middle managers involved in strategic planning compared the effectiveness of dialectical inquiry, devil's advocacy, and consensus approaches to ...
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences
Kirk, R. (2013) · doi:10.4135/9781483384733 · Cited by 8,539
Effects of the expert, devil's advocate, and dialectical inquiry methods on prediction performance
Schwenk, C. R., & Cosier, R. A. (1980) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(80)90076-8 · Cited by 132
Corporate decision making: An empirical study.
Stagner, R. (1969) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0026849 · Cited by 108
Cited by
A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict
Jehn, K. A. (1995) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393638 · Cited by 4,050
THE DYNAMIC NATURE OF CONFLICT: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF INTRAGROUP CONFLICT AND GROUP PERFORMANCE.
Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2001) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/3069453 · Cited by 2,487
Amason, A. C. (1996) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256633 · Cited by 2,584
MAKING USE OF DIFFERENCE: DIVERSITY, DEBATE, AND DECISION COMPREHENSIVENESS IN TOP MANAGEMENT TEAMS.
Simons, T., Pelled, L. H., & Smith, K. A. (1999) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256987 · Cited by 1,235
Contradictions, Dialectics, and Paradoxes in Organizations: A Constitutive Approach
Putnam, L. L., Fairhurst, G. T., & Banghart, S. (2016) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2016.1162421 · Cited by 1,116
Metadata
- Authors
- SCHWEIGER, D. M., SANDBERG, W. R., & RECHNER, P. L.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1989-12-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 745-772
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W1973888644
- Cited by
- 488
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
