The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
BUILDING COMMITMENT, ATTACHMENT, AND TRUST IN STRATEGIC DECISION-MAKING TEAMS: THE ROLE OF PROCEDURAL JUSTICE.
Abstract
This study examined how decision-making procedures can facilitate the positive attitudes necessary for cooperative relations in decisionmaking teams. We hypothesized that consideration of member input and members' influence on a decision affect their perceptions of procedural fairness and consequently, their commitment to the decision, attachment to the group, and trust in its leader. An experiment involving intact management teams supported these hypotheses and indicated that perceived fairness partially mediated the impact of procedures on commitment, attachment, and trust.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Adams, J. S. (1965) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60108-2 · Cited by 10,818
Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences
Kirk, R. (2013) · doi:10.4135/9781483384733 · Cited by 8,539
The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice
Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988) · Critical Issues in Social Justice · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2115-4 · Cited by 6,585
Deutsch, M. (1958) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/002200275800200401 · Cited by 2,077
McFarlin, D. B., & Sweeney, P. D. (1992) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256489 · Cited by 1,704
Schweiger, D. M., Sandberg, W. R., & Ragan, J. W. (1986) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/255859 · Cited by 682
Self-citationStrategy implementation versus middle management self‐interest
Guth, W. D., & Macmillan, I. C. (1986) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250070403 · Cited by 671
Cited by
Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model1
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036519 · Cited by 8,635
Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425 · Cited by 5,942
Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice.
Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.611 · Cited by 3,550
What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639702300303 · Cited by 3,526
Between Trust and Control: Developing Confidence in Partner Cooperation in Alliances
Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259291 · Cited by 3,358
Metadata
- Authors
- Korsgaard, M. A., Schweiger, D. M., & Sapienza, H. J.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1995-02-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 60-84
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2061374982
- Cited by
- 1,029
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 31.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BUILDING COMMITMENT, ATTACHMENT, AND TRUST IN STRATEGIC DECISION-MAKING TEAMS: THE ROLE OF PROCEDURAL JUSTICE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/256728
- The paper
- Korsgaard, M. A., Schweiger, D. M., & Sapienza, H. J. (1995). BUILDING COMMITMENT, ATTACHMENT, AND TRUST IN STRATEGIC DECISION-MAKING TEAMS: THE ROLE OF PROCEDURAL JUSTICE. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/256728
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
